Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: knighthawk
The older brother, M, 20, now has been found guilty of his role in three different gang rapes committed 20 days apart involving four women.

Why are they protecting the identity of a 20-year-old convicted felon? Any insight into Australia here?

3 posted on 07/11/2002 4:03:15 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
Some countries have law protecting the identity of perpetrators. The Netherlands also never place full names, but another reason is that the names reveal the ethinc background, and as you can see in one of the links below, the Australian government doensn't want to stir up things.
9 posted on 07/11/2002 4:15:14 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
Why are they protecting the identity ... - Because if they hadn't protected the identity of a rapist in England in the early seventies he could never had become the President of the united states from 93-01!
19 posted on 07/11/2002 4:45:43 PM PDT by Free_at_last_-2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
Why are they protecting the identity of a 20-year-old convicted felon? Any insight into Australia here?

Well, Brothers I and S got together and called their cousin L who brought two friends - A and M and then the trouble started.

24 posted on 07/11/2002 5:12:34 PM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson