Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
Weren't we told that Section 245(i) only applied to foreign nationals who were the victims of INS paperwork snafus, and that it couldn't be exploited by terrorists?

Yes, we were. And I remember who did the telling.

You weren't waiting for a retraction, were you?

10 posted on 07/11/2002 11:58:29 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter
"Weren't we told that Section 245(i) only applied to foreign nationals who were the victims of INS paperwork snafus..."

I said that, as did others, and it's still one of the many designed functions of the extension.

"...and that it couldn't be exploited by terrorists?"

I didn't say that, but there's little that couldn't be exploited by terrorists, including a Visa for a homicide bomber and his family to go visit the Mouse in Orlando.

Face it, a terrorist could enter the nation as part of a visiting orchestra, to visit family, conduct a legitimate business transaction...any reason.

27 posted on 07/11/2002 2:55:06 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson