So ""None of these beliefs (about terrorism) are based in fact" according to Larry, in July 2001? It's nice to know that a guy who's now making bucks off 9/11 as an "expert" had the same head-in-the-sand mentality that made 9/11 possible, as a less than illustrious member of the Clintonista State Department.
I'll be taking what he says (particularly his criticism) with a grain of salt from now on.
Thanks for the post.
Yes, but the 00s have already beat the 90s.
...Colombia, which had 186 incidents ...
While 82 percent of the attacks in Colombia were on oil pipelines managed by American and British companies, these attacks were less about terrorism than about guerrillas' goal of disrupting oil production to undermine the Colombian economy. Generally, the guerrillas shy away from causing casualties in these attacks. No American oil workers in Colombia were killed or injured last year.
So 82% of the 186 attacks weren't terrorism then? Or were they? It sounds like the guerrillas are using sense here to fight their little war -- they are hitting the economy, not killing non-combatants.
Eleven incidents involved kidnappings of one or more American citizens, all of whom were eventually released. Seven of those kidnapped worked for American companies in the energy business or providing services to it - Halliburton, Shell, Chevron, Mobil, Noble Drilling and Erickson Air-Crane.
Why does it matter that they were energy workers? What about more recent examples -- The Phillipines missionary or Pearl? They were returned safely, weren't they?
What I see in this article is alot of old data. Comming from a Clintonite, much of it was probably fudged anyway to make everyone feel happy.
I also see an important difference between the guerillas of Latin America and the Islamists of the world. One is on a nationalistic power trip, and uses terrorism as a means to secure funds or negotiations. The other uses terrorism for the sole purpose of mass genocide.
Um... hate to break in with reality here, but it appears from a web search that Johnson was a Bush 41 counterterrorism honcho, not a Clintonite.