Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Selection a swipe at Florida's activist high court
St. Petersburg Times ^ | July 11, 2002 | JULIE HAUSERMAN

Posted on 07/11/2002 2:24:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

TALLAHASSEE -- Gov. Jeb Bush on Wednesday used his appointment of Raoul Cantero III to the Florida Supreme Court to lash out at judges who stretch their legal boundaries.

"Increasingly," said Bush, posed strategically with the Supreme Court's white columns as a backdrop, "courts have seized control over policy decisions that are not theirs to make."

The courts, he said, "are not mini-legislatures or governors."

Bush's comments reflect the tension that has existed among the Supreme Court, the Republican governor and the Legislature during the past four years. Bush and lawmakers have seen the courts strike down priority efforts such as abortion and the death penalty.

Wednesday, Bush said his appointment of Cantero, the first justice he has appointed entirely on his own, "is a chance for me to make a difference in the future of the state."

It could have a long-term impact. Cantero is 41 and eligible to serve a lifelong term. An appellate lawyer from Miami, Cantero is the first Hispanic ever appointed to the state Supreme Court. He replaces retiring justice Major Harding on Sept. 1.

Five of the seven justices now sitting on the state Supreme Court were appointed by Gov. Lawton Chiles, and a sixth was appointed by Democrat Bob Graham. The seventh, Peggy Quince, was appointed jointly by Bush and Chiles.

If Bush is re-elected this fall, he will get a chance to appoint another Supreme Court justice. Justice Leander Shaw will retire in early January.

Bush said Cantero is "humble" and shares the philosophy of judicial restraint.

"I did ask questions to all the candidates about their view of the role of the judiciary," Bush said.

Cantero has never been a judge before. He is a conservative Catholic, like Bush. The governor insists that Cantero's political views were not a factor in his appointment. And Wednesday, Cantero was mum on those views.

When asked whether he opposes the death penalty, Cantero said: "I have no views."

Florida Supreme Court justices spend about half their time on death penalty cases.

Cantero's views on abortion are known: He wrote a letter to the editor of the Miami Herald in 1993 to defend anti-abortion protesters, saying: "Abortions kill children."

When asked about abortion Wednesday, Cantero said: "My personal views on any particular issue will not keep me from applying the law, whatever the law is."

Cantero is a grandson of former Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista. His nomination prompted a flood of support from Cuban-Americans.

It also sparked controversy because Cantero helped defend Orlando Bosch, an anti-Castro extremist who was labeled a terrorist by the U.S. government for his purported ties to bombing raids on Cuba. Bosch was held in a Venezuelan prison for years on charges of masterminding the October 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed all 73 people on board. He was acquitted three times and said he had nothing to do with it, but he supported it.

The Justice Department had ordered Bosch deported because of his terrorist ties, but his attorneys negotiated a deal that let him stay in Miami.

Cantero appeared on a Miami radio talk show in 1989 and called Bosch a "Cuban patriot."

When asked about Bosch, Bush said: "Everybody has a right to an attorney. I have no problems that Raoul was part of the team that represented Orlando Bosch."

Cantero applied two years ago to be Bush's general counsel, but Charles Canady got the job. One of Cantero's recommendation letters then noted he was part of a volunteer group of lawyers called "Team Elian," who handled a case involving the famous Cuban refugee, Elian Gonzalez.

It's hard to predict what effect Cantero will have on the court.

"This court is not one that can be labeled ideologically," said Barry Richard, a Tallahassee lawyer who frequently handles Supreme Court cases. "I don't find this court to be particularly liberal or activist."

Bush said he was proud to appoint a Hispanic but stressed it was not his overriding principle. Instead, he said, he wanted a judge who would apply the laws fairly and "not represent any one particular view."

Cantero was among four people in line for the Supreme Court seat: Chris Altenbernd, a member of the 2nd District Court of Appeal in Tampa, Circuit Judge Kenneth Bell of Pensacola, and Judges Phil Padovano and Peter Webster of the 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: benchlegislation

1 posted on 07/11/2002 2:24:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
A Times Editorial - Political theater - Gov. Jeb Bush's appointment of Raul Cantero III to the state Supreme Court and the way Bush described his contempt for the entire American judiciary made for good political theater. - © St. Petersburg Times published July 11, 2002 ------ [Full Text]Gov. Jeb Bush went to the west plaza of the Capitol Wednesday, so the Supreme Court building would show in the background, to announce his appointment of Raul Cantero III as the replacement for retiring Justice Major Harding. But for a few minutes it seemed the event was less about Cantero's niche in history, as Florida's first ethnic Hispanic justice, than about Bush's re-election campaign. As Cantero waited to be introduced, the governor sharply denounced the entire American judiciary. He decried the "increasing power of courts" which, he said, "should not come at the expense of institutions that have a more legitimate claim to govern our lives." Far too often, he said, "our courts . . . have substituted their own personal views for the laws enacted by the people and their representatives. . . . Increasingly, courts have seized control over policy decisions that are not theirs to make."

The scene and the subject made great political theater. Those who missed it on the evening news will have second and subsequent chances in the form of Bush campaign commercials, no doubt featuring his specific reference to the recent Pledge of Allegiance ruling, which he described as a danger to "the institutions and customs that hold us together as a society."

The governor also plainly had the death penalty in mind. Just the day before, he had said he would continue to sign death warrants despite the Supreme Court's decision to stay two executions while it contemplates, as it surely should, whether Florida's death sentencing system is endangered by the U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Arizona's. Attempting more executions while that serious issue is unresolved is, at best, a waste of time and money for no apparent purpose other than politics.

Contempt for courts cuts both ways, of course. Liberals could speak as ill of some of the Rehnquist court's decisions overturning acts of Congress and undermining the Bill of Rights. The more troubling part of it is the governor's assertion that either of the other branches of government, the executive or the legislative, has a "more legitimate" claim to govern. In the American system, each branch is equal. It bears remembering that not so long ago there were politicians, including most of Florida's, who raged that the courts had no right to interfere with racial segregation and the malapportionment of legislatures. Who today would say those courts had abused their powers?

Bush's polemic introduction invited the question: What commitments had the governor sought from Cantero? None, he insisted, apart from every candidate's standard and proper promise to try to follow the law rather than make it. The governor said he had asked no "litmus test" questions of anyone, as to do so "would be improper."

On one such question, of course, Cantero's position was already well known. He opposes abortion, having so expressed himself in a letter to a newspaper. He is entitled to that or any other personal view; the real question is how he will reconcile it with the Florida court's 1989 decision that abortion is protected by the Florida Constitution's right to privacy provision. Cantero said Wednesday he would not let his personal opinion on any particular issue influence his understanding of the law.

Bush was disingenuous, however, in responding to a question about Cantero's public advocacy of the anti-Castro terrorist Orlando Bosch during deportation proceedings 13 years ago. Everyone has a right to a lawyer, the governor said. True enough. But that wasn't the issue. On talk radio, far removed from any court, Cantero had defended Bosch as a "Cuban patriot." That's interesting. The U.S. government called him a terrorist. [End]

2 posted on 07/11/2002 2:40:00 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
April 12, 2002- Ann Coulter: Not moving, part II- You know you've lived a good life when both Fidel Castro and Bill Clinton mutter your name in disgust. If Vlad the Impaler knew about Orlando Bosch, he'd have belched out Bosch's name, too. - [Full Text] Just a few months ago, Fidel Castro was regaling an audience in Havana's Plaza de la Revolucion with tales of Bosch's perfidy. In the sort of crisp, punchy speaking style that draws millions to hear him (nearly as much as the threat of execution), Castro compared Bosch to the Sept. 11 terrorists. Bosch, Castro said, was the perpetrator of a "monstrous terrorist act."

Similarly, Clinton invoked Bosch's name recently while being interviewed for Newsweek's Clinton Rehabilitation Project. Angrily describing ruckus over his fire sale on presidential pardons, Clinton sneered: "I swore I wouldn't answer questions about Marc Rich until (former president) Bush answered about Orlando Bosch."

(Note that Clinton's position is that the Rich pardon "wasn't worth the damage to my reputation" -- which was unblemished until then. Rich deserved a pardon, but if he had to do it over again, Clinton would have withheld the pardon solely to protect his own reputation.)

In the honest reporting Americans have come to expect from the mainstream media, Newsweek went on to explain that Bosch -- quote -- "blew up an airliner in 1976, killing 73, and was freed from jail in 1990 by then-President Bush under pressure from his son Jeb and Cuban exiles."

On the basis of the Newsweek account, one might think that Bosch blew up an airliner in 1976, killing 73, and was freed from jail in 1990 by then-President Bush under pressure from his son Jeb and Cuban exiles. In fact, Bosch was cleared of any connection to the airline bombing. Twice. In Venezuelan courts.

When not trying to rehabilitate Clinton, liberals wail that Venezuelan courts are human-rights violators more malignant than Ken Starr. Yet it was Venezuela's criminal justice system that produced two acquittals for Bosch -- in both civilian and military courts.

It took DNA evidence and a score of witnesses for liberals to stop shouting "allegedly" about Clinton's crimes. But an anti-Castro Cuban is deemed guilty even of the crimes of which he has been formally acquitted. Twice. In Venezuela.

Bosch's only known violent crime -- admittedly not proved with DNA evidence and a score of witnesses, but found by a jury nevertheless -- was to fire a rifle at a Polish ship docked off of Miami in 1968. No one was hurt and the ship was only slightly damaged, making it a more successful operation than John F. Kennedy's Bay of Pigs invasion. But, inexplicably, it is a crime to fire a rifle at communist freighters headed to Cuba.

For his one crime -- taking a shot at the Polish ship -- The New York Times labeled Bosch "one of the hemisphere's most notorious terrorists." (The other being Ken Starr.) Liberals so love Castro's Cuba, the last Great White Hope for a socialist paradise, they sometimes forget that being an anti-communist is not generally regarded as a terrorist act.

Bosch was paroled in 1974, but soon violated his parole by fleeing rather than testifying against a fellow anti-Castro Cuban. When Linda Tripp made a different choice about testifying against a friend, the Times didn't like that either. You can't win with these liberals.

After being held in Venezuelan jails for a decade while being (repeatedly) found innocent by Venezuelan courts, Bosch flew to Miami, turned himself in, and served three months in prison for his earlier parole violation.

But instead of releasing him, Attorney General Dick Thornburgh decided to deport Bosch in order to make room for Muslim terrorists interested in attending flight school. Surprisingly enough, the only country itching to admit Bosch was Cuba. So in 1990, when Bosch was in his 60s, the Bush Justice Department released him from a deportation holding cell with the proviso that he renounce violence and wear an electronic ankle bracelet for monitoring by federal agents.

The New York Times hysterically denounced the decision to release Bosch, claiming that Bosch was "known" for bombings. With slightly more plausibility, Bill Clinton is "known" for murdering Vince Foster. The Times also accused Bosch of being "a hero in the anti-Castro communities." If liberals hated homicidal Muslim fanatics half as much as they hate anti-communist Cubans, all of America would finally be behind the war on terrorism.

After Clinton skulked out of the White House with the silverware and pardon bribe money in his pocket, there were a dozen articles written by Clinton's most devoted media pets citing the dread case of Orlando Bosch, Terrorist. Bosch should probably be happy the Clinton Rehabilitation Project isn't calling him a stalker. [End]

3 posted on 07/11/2002 2:50:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Cantero - GOOD/bad
Bosch - BAD/good
JEB - GOOD/bad
X42i - BAD/traitor

Do we get score cards or do we need to bring our PDAs? :-)

4 posted on 07/11/2002 3:18:59 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
<< This court is not one that can be labeled ideologically," said Barry Richard, a Tallahassee lawyer who frequently handles Supreme Court cases. "I don't find this court to be particularly liberal or activist." >>

I guess this dick was on vacation on the moon during the last presidential erection?

Or went to the same school as Hellen Keller?
5 posted on 07/11/2002 4:45:39 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
I suspect Barry Richard (a liberal Democrat himself, I understand, despite his effective work for the Bush campaign in the post-election litigation) is currying favor with the court for his future cases.
6 posted on 07/11/2002 5:07:09 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Article should mention that Jeb may have more appointments if any of the justices up for a retention vote this year loses. I understand two of the justices are, the chief judge and Anstead. I certainly hope Anstead (perhaps the worst leftist on the court) loses.
7 posted on 07/11/2002 5:08:48 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
No...the article certainly didn't mention the judges up for retention....any news at all regarding their renom numbers? Or is that not something one polls for?
8 posted on 07/11/2002 7:13:03 AM PDT by Katya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Katya
No, I haven't seen poll numbers for the justices, but then I don't live in Florida. I think justices in practice are always retained by lopsided votes (for example, Pariente -- the other extreme leftist on the court -- easily won retention in 2000). However, I don't think their retention has ever been seriously contested. I think it would be a good idea to do so with Anstead. If he were defeated, not only would it take a leading leftist off the court (to be replaced by a conservative,) but his defeat would put the fear of God into the other leftists.
9 posted on 07/11/2002 7:29:44 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I don't find this court to be particularly liberal or activist."

I have some great land deals in Florida that might interest you.

10 posted on 07/11/2002 8:46:02 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Thanks for including the St. Pete Times editorial in your post #2. That newspaper seems to do nothing but criticize Gov. Bush. BTW, here is the entire statement made by Gov. Bush, which the St. Pete Times quoted from very selectively:

Governor's Office > Media Center & Lib. > News Rel. Search

Statement from Governor Jeb Bush Regarding
the Appointment of Raoul Cantero, III to the Florida Supreme Court


For Immediate Release
Wednesday, July 10, 2002

Contact:
Lisa Gates
(850) 488-5394

"I'm here to announce my appointment of Raoul Cantero to replace retiring Justice Major Harding on the Florida Supreme Court. Before I introduce Raoul, I'd like to make a couple of preliminary points and talk a bit about judicial philosophy.

"First, I want to once again thank Justice Harding for his many years of distinguished service on the Court. Justice Harding is a particularly beloved figure, and he will be hard to replace. I also want to commend the Supreme Court JNC for having sent me a truly outstanding slate of candidates. Each of the other nominees is already a sitting judge, and the people of Florida are blessed to have public servants of such high caliber.

"This appointment comes at a time when it's abundantly clear that courts profoundly affect our everyday lives. Courts can safeguard opportunities for the neediest among us, as the U.S. Supreme Court did in its recent decision on school choice and education reform. In death penalty cases, courts make fundamental decisions about life and death, and about victims' ability to obtain justice. Courts routinely issue rulings that govern the relationship between parents and children. And, as the Pledge of Allegiance case demonstrates, court decisions can even endanger the institutions and customs that hold us together as a society. Judges-particularly appellate judges-do their work in a cloistered setting. Nonetheless, their actions have real consequences that affect all of us.

"But the increasing power of courts in our society should not come at the expense of institutions that have a more legitimate claim to govern our lives. To paraphrase John Adams, we are a government of laws and not of men. Far too often, our courts have ignored this basic principle and substituted their own personal views for the laws enacted by the people and their representatives. Increasingly, courts have seized control over policy decisions that are not theirs to make. I'd prefer that judges distinguish themselves by their adherence to the foundational principle of the separation of powers. I don't know of any Floridian or American who's consented to government by the judiciary.

"As courts grow ever more powerful, there is an even greater need for judges who are humble about the judicial role. Humble in the sense that they know courts are not mini-Legislatures or Governors. And in the sense of understanding that a court betrays its duty when it imposes its personal will on the rest of us.

"Courts exist to protect freedom. This includes the individual rights that each of us holds dear. But freedom also means the shared right of the people to govern themselves through their elected representatives in the Legislature and the Executive Branch. A healthy respect for the people's right of self-government-and a strong dose of humility-are absolute prerequisites for a good judge.
Raoul Cantero has both of these qualities.

"Raoul was born in Madrid, Spain to Cuban parents. His family brought him to Miami as a nine-month-old. Raoul is married to Ana Maria Cantero, and together they're the parents of three children-Christian, Michael, and Elisa. Raoul got his undergraduate degree here at FSU and then attended Harvard Law School. During a 14-year career in private practice, Raoul has developed into one of the finest appellate advocates in the state. He also distinguished himself in public service through an eight-year tenure on the Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Board.

"I'm proud to say that Raoul will be the first Hispanic ever to serve on the Florida Supreme Court. This means a lot to me, and I want to be clear about why I think it is important. The significance of this appointment is not that Raoul will in some sense "represent" the views of Hispanics on the Court. That is not the role of a judge. Raoul's achievement is important because it proves that service on our state's highest court is open to men and women of excellence from all backgrounds.

"This is one of the most important decisions I'll make as Governor. And I'm confident that I've made the right one. Above all else, Raoul Cantero is a man of exceptional character. He will undoubtedly make me-and the people of Florida-proud."
11 posted on 07/11/2002 8:53:21 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Bump!
12 posted on 07/11/2002 9:13:46 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If the SCOFLAW Justices up for retention this year are tossed out by Fla voters, and Jeb's re-elected, he'll get the opportunity to name two additional conservative replacements. This would transform the 7-0 Dwarfs court into a 4-3 Court which would still be controlled by the Rats but there's a good chance at least one of them could vote with the conservatives in some cases. In another few years another leftist Justice would retire and the SCOFLAW would finally be transformed into a responsible appelate court. Its still not too late to rescue the rule of law in Fla and with the appointment of Raoul Cantero to the state's highest court, Jeb has taken one step in that direction.
13 posted on 07/11/2002 10:02:12 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
:)
14 posted on 07/11/2002 10:02:53 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
FYI. :)
15 posted on 07/14/2002 7:10:38 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: summer
Thanks for the ping.

And this is very good:

If Bush is re-elected this fall, he will get a chance to appoint another Supreme Court justice. Justice Leander Shaw will retire in early January.

I have serious doubts that Bush will have trouble getting re-elected.....very good for the people of Florida.

16 posted on 07/14/2002 7:23:16 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I agree - Gov. Bush is on his way to making history, as the first GOP FL gov to win a 2nd term. :)
17 posted on 07/14/2002 7:38:05 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: summer
the first GOP FL gov to win a 2nd term

This I did not know.....summer, you are a wealth of information on all things Floridian, lol. Thanks for all your posts.

18 posted on 07/14/2002 7:49:40 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
My pleasure! Thank YOU for your interest, nicmarlo. :)
19 posted on 07/14/2002 8:01:22 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson