[aristeides]

I thought the Enquirer had learned to be careful after a couple of libel suits in the early 90's. Even if this story is totally false, I find it hard to believe a jury would come down hard on the Enquirer. They might find for Mrs. Condit, but award her a ridiculously small amount of money. After all, the judge has now left it up to the jury to determine whether she has suffered any damage at all.

[Betty Jo]

Danger! Danger!

Does this mean the little wife has to get on a witness stand?

Under oath?

Uh-oh!

Coudn't a lawyer fresh out of law school ask some really good questions?

Some how I don't think it's going to be as simple as "Did you speak to Chandra Levy?