It sure would be interesting to compare the volume and type of press coverage Judicial Watch gets when it goes after Bush-Cheney compared to the coverage they got when they sued Clinton, wouldn't it?
You know, I want to ask a question. Assuming that there is merit to this lawsuit (which I don't believe for a minute) could it not have waited until AFTER we invade Iraq? I mean, is this lawsuit so important to these two plaintiffs (one of whom bought the stock a year ago and has actually made money, while the other bought in November of last year) that they couldn't have delayed their lawsuit? Could they not have just sued Halliburton to recover whatever money they were owed? Why is it so necessary to go after Cheney during a time of war?
Let me once again state that I do not believe Cheney is guilty of any wrong-doing. What I want to know is how important this suit is to these plaintiffs in comparison to their nation's winning the war. And how did someone from Indiana and someone from New Mexico get hooked up with Klaymamn, anyway?
I have LOTS of questions, as you can see!
Well, you can go to the MEDIA thingy at Judicial Watch and scroll back through the years, at least to '97.
Klayman archives ALL articles about him in the press. You'll see there aren't many at ALL until 2001 or so.