[Joe Hadenuf]

Yes, Joe, I have *known* some criminals in my lifetime. You chose to replace "known" with "associate with" (note verb tense)bla bla

Actually lets look at what you actually said:

I've known four illegal aliens, three of them quite well, over the years

Three of them quite well.

This is a pretty clear statement. A smoking gun if you will...

Are you saying that everyone you've ever known has never broken a law?

No offense, but this is a dumb statement. I don't make it a habit of asking the people in my work and life if they have a past criminal record. But I can assure you, I don't know "three illegal aliens quite well". Even if I did, I would never admit it. LOL!

[GreenEggsHam]

Actually lets look at what you actually said:

I've known four illegal aliens, three of them quite well, over the years

Three of them quite well.
+++
This is a pretty clear statement. A smoking gun if you will...
+++
That's probably because you're quick to assume something bad about me in an effort to bolster your own argument which is not based on logic, but rather assumptions. One comes to know many different types of people in their lives. Some of them quite well. Not all people I know "quite well" in my life do I like or even respect. Not all people I know "quite well" in my life do I wish I even knew.
++++
Are you saying that everyone you've ever known has never broken a law?

No offense, but this is a dumb statement. I don't make it a habit of asking the people in my work and life if they have a past criminal record. But I can assure you, I don't know "three illegal aliens quite well". Even if I did, I would never admit it. LOL!
++++
It wasn't a statement Joe, it was a challenge to the "logic" you were using when you chose to make what was a civil debate a personal attack on me. Otherwise known as a rhetorical question. I believe you when you say you would never admit it. Quel surprise.