[ProudAmerican2]

When I was scanning the wires, I noticed something interesting. When Judicial Watch went after the Clinton, they were called a "right-wing group". Now that JW is going after Cheney, they are now listed as a "public interest group". Sometimes, the media can't help but show its bias.

Simple explanation: Judicial Watch initially only sued Democrats. Now Judicial Watch is much more bipartisan.

[Howlin]

Now Judicial Watch is much more bipartisan.

Now, help me out here, doesn't "bipartisan" mean both sides equally?

Kindly point me to ANY cases that JW has filed against anybody except Republicans since Bush took office.

Even a press release will do.

One is left to assume that Klayman believes the Democrats do now wrong.

[L.N. Smithee]

Simple explanation: Judicial Watch initially only sued Democrats. Now Judicial Watch is much more bipartisan.

The Clinton Administration was the target of the majority of the suits by JW. However, Klayman did sue to discover details of the multi-million dollar book deal between Newt Gingrich and HarperCollins. HarperCollins is owned by Aussie media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who was allegedly seeking help to fight off legal challenges to his ownership of an American TV network.