To: terilyn
I've been out of pocket for a few days.
I say, let the chips fall where they may.
If they tumble down on Larry Klayman's head, so be it. But he seems to have the Veep's office referring all calls to Halliburton, and Halliburton's CEO seems to have confirmed JW's point of view.
Halliburton is trying to distance itself from the Veep. I wonder why that is?
To: Fred Mertz
Halliburton is trying to distance itself from the VeepLink, please.
To: Fred Mertz
Wrong.
Larry's point of view is that Halliburton practiced illegal accounting. Halliburton is hardly confirming that. What they've confirmed is that Cheney was CEO and was aware of Halliburton's change in accounting practices and signed off on their 1998 & 1999 financials. Gosh, how unethical. The same year he first signs off on those financials they just happen to have the fact that there was a change reported in the footnotes as required by the SEC.
How utterly unethical can he get. I can hardly stand it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson