To: SierraWasp; Howlin
I work the overnite shift .....and this was on ALL top of the hour news updates.......Larry outdid himself with this one....liberal media is running with this one...
2 posted on
07/10/2002 11:06:53 AM PDT by
Dog
To: Dog
Yet, I don't remember the press getting too excited over all of Larry's lawsuits against members of the Clinton administration. Surprise, surprise, the press is biased.
To: Dog
Yep. First thing you see on the AOL front page is this story. Amazing how none of the Clinton lawsuits got this much coverage.
To: Dog
Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." Wow, who would have EVER thought it, huh?
48 posted on
07/10/2002 1:19:05 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Dog
is Larry a fruitcake or what? Last year he sued too! July 17th, any word on that one? LOL
49 posted on
07/10/2002 1:20:15 PM PDT by
TLBSHOW
To: Dog
...I work the overnite shift .....and this was on ALL top of the hour news updates.......Larry outdid himself with this one....liberal media is running with this one......and even Downunder, with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation running the story, complete with Klayman audio, at the top of the 8:00AM radio news.
To: Dog; maica
liberal media is running with this one... Tonight Mara Liasson on Fox said "We have Cheney who IS doing some of these same things." Brit Hume reminded her that it was only an allegation. Her use of the present tense was curious. She also referred to the current occupant of the White House as "President Clinton." No bias here.
To: Dog
I have challenged people on this board to give me ONE piece of evidence unearthed by Klayman that resulted in a successful prosecution of ONE Clinton official. I don't think any has surfaced yet. Klayman played many of us like harps during impeachment with his claims that his depositions were going to unearth something big.
Now, without Clinton, Larry's contributions are down (surprise). Time to do something to get the money flowing again. It is sad.
435 posted on
07/11/2002 7:33:28 AM PDT by
LS
To: Dog
Of course it was. Cheney's a republican. It was on the front page of the pathetic little local paper here. J Watch sued Clinton or a memeber of the Clinton admin every day for five years and it never made the networks and very few papers. And when it was mentioned, JW and Klayman was dismissed as a rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth right wing Clinton-hater. Now that Cheney is the target, the presstitutes call JW "a Washington based watchdog group"
445 posted on
07/11/2002 9:14:58 AM PDT by
wny
To: Dog
All arguments over the merits of this lawsuit aside, it is interesting (actually, nauseating) that far more interesting lawsuits filed by Judicial Watch were routinely ignored by these news media four and five years ago.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson