I agree 100 percent. Too bad it's not an honest attorney. I'll go with Fred Barnes, who just called Klayman "a crank." Larry Klayman will not be the instrument to clear Cheney; Cheney and Halliburton will do that for themselves with the SEC; this will just be one more of Klayman's lawsuits that have no end in sight.
I do think it's funny, though, to watch these diehard Klayman supporters trying to justify this new interest in Klayman by the media. Klayman has become a pawn and they just won't acknowledge it. He's trying to play in the big leagues and it's just not going to happen for him, IMO.
I supported Klayman when he was going after Clinton -- after all, REAL crimes had been committed.
I hardly think you can classify Laura Bush having coffee with Hillary Clinton and PROVING she is just as corrupt as Hillary, which is EXACTLY what Klayman said about her.
It's one thing to "go after corruption," quite another to "manufacture it."
Yes, Klayman is a bit 'cranky', and didn't we all love it when he was twisting Clinton's crank! That said, do I believe he sometimes thinks of himself as a modern-day Don Quixote? Yes. However, I also find myself agreeing with the Don that just because others see windmills as windmills, that doesn't mean that they might not be giants indeed. Where most in this country saw a 'private sexual matter' we here saw the ghastly spectre behind that particular windmill and so did Klayman.
As far as JW's suits being never-ending, I applaud that fact most loudly. He told me that he is through with neither John Huang or various other bad actors from the eight year reign of terror of the i42.
Please let me preface my last line with this: I do not equate Larry Klayman or his actions with President George W. Bush. But many on this thread have had to defend some of W's actions in spite of the fact that we have not liked them all. IMHO, we need tilters at government windmills just as much as we need honest, decent, patriotic men like GWB.