Halliburton called the claims in the [Judicial Watch] suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." Sort of like the kiddie-porn charge against you. Starting to see the light, yet?
Or do you still think Larry Klayman has a right to make "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded" claims about the vice-president?
No, I don't see any light in you referring to kiddie-porn to make a point. I find it disgusting. Do you use this tactic to make points outside the forum, because it is tasteless.