This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Yes or no?
841
posted on
07/11/2002 4:57:51 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Fred Mertz
Fred, I haven't heard your "Go Larry Go!" statement!
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
At least I do not take statements you may have made in unrelated threads, and use them to personally attack you.
If I give people a tough time, I take their words from the thread at hand, not from other ones.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Better be careful woofie, or else you will spend your life trolling these threads too. I dont usually troll I use a trottline...also do a little flyfishing
844
posted on
07/11/2002 4:59:54 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: woofie
You haven't changed a bit :)
To: FreedominJesusChrist
But you are ignoring why we are still here, including deport.
Do you agree with Larry Klayman's statement that Cheney is the "de facto president" and is actually running the country?
All you have to do is answer the question. Why won't you do so?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
At least I do not take statements you may have made in unrelated threads, and use them to personally attack you.No, you just go to unrelated threads, find your friends, and ask them to go ridicule people posting (not even to YOU) elsewhere. That is far more acceptable. [Rolling my eyes.]
To: Miss Marple
I already gave you my answer: to a certain degree. And that is all you are going to get out of me.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Then I will go with Iwo Jima's contempt citation.
You are either afraid of Larrry, or you are afraid of us. No other conclusion can be drawn.
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Daughter,
I will not do that to you ever again, I am sorry that I offended you so much.
I didn't mean it in such a serious way and neither did the people who commented on it.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
You're an absolute saint!!! Actually, you prove a point I made earlier-- everbody has to play according to your rules. As I said in that post-- you're here with the big kids-- if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
To: Miss Marple
I don't fear either of them.
How can I fear man I don't even talk to?
To: Clara Lou
Hey, if you noticed. I did not have to ping people over to defend me and I didn't ask to have your thong comments removed either.
To: Howlin; All
I was surfing around the Washington Times today and one article an interesting little tidbit:
The suit says Halliburton and Andersen violated securities laws when they did not disclose and justify the accounting change in a letter to investors. Halliburton's financial statements starting in 1998 do note, however, that it was booking uncollected revenue from cost overruns.
To: SierraWasp
Larry Klayman was correctly identified by James Carville as a 'pathetic little twerp'.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Read my post about the thong. I did not say "your thong." I said "CYA is what a thong does not do." They wouldn't pull it because it was not made to refer to you nor any other person at FR. I stated it that way on purpose. You are such a whiner when it suits you.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I will not do that to you ever again, I am sorry that I offended you so much.You know something? Truthfully, the things you and your friends do don't really bother me. People here can be very rude and insulting (as we have all witnessed), and I just take it for what it's worth. I just think the victim act is a little ironic.
That said, apology accepted. Take it easy.
To: Miss Marple
None. If you have convictions, you should at least be willing to state them publically. Especially on a political board.
We all know she thinks whatever Larry thinks, whenever Larry thinks it.
A real conservative would know that was a lie, but then remember, Larry's not a conservative anymore.
858
posted on
07/11/2002 5:08:17 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Lady In Blue
Well, well.
There goes Larry's case.
859
posted on
07/11/2002 5:09:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Catspaw; Iwo Jima; one_particular_harbour
See Lady in Blue's post 854.
860
posted on
07/11/2002 5:11:19 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840, 841-860, 861-880 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson