Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^ | 7/10/2002 | MarketWatch.com

Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp

12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,6201,621-1,6401,641-1,660 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: Howlin; FreedominJesusChrist; deport
Nowhere on that thread did anybody say "Freep this poll."

I believe I did say it needed FReeping. Altho, as deport said, it was already losing by the time I got there, and there weren't too many additional votes cast after the link was posted.

Point is, Larry should've waited til the poll CLOSED before putting up a press release based on the results....

And when the results changed, the HONEST thing to do would've been revise his press release...but who cares about HONESTY when your motives are pure? ;-)

1,621 posted on 07/13/2002 8:30:00 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1602 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Isn't that Gary Larsen's work??
1,622 posted on 07/13/2002 8:30:13 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1614 | View Replies]

To: Registered; Howlin
Man, what is it with you and your bondage stuff? Or should I ask?

First this:

and now this

Dude, and this is after a hard on?

1,623 posted on 07/13/2002 8:30:18 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1614 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Read my last post.
1,624 posted on 07/13/2002 8:30:31 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1619 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
oopsie. gary says thats a no-no :)
1,625 posted on 07/13/2002 8:30:50 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1622 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
but I still believe that many people on this site purposefully went to the JW site and voted no, to skew the results.

GRIP reality.

1,626 posted on 07/13/2002 8:31:39 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1620 | View Replies]

To: deport
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the poll was FReeped after the JW press release. Sheesh.
1,627 posted on 07/13/2002 8:31:56 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1618 | View Replies]

Comment #1,628 Removed by Moderator

To: Amelia
Honestly, thanks for being so honest, Amelia. :)
1,629 posted on 07/13/2002 8:32:46 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Vague, didn't answer my post at all, and I wont bother asking you a direct questionwhen I can scroll back thru the pages of FR and see where you accused FR members of stacking a poll at JW with "NO's" when in reality, JW groupies probably stacked it with YES's. LOL

L

1,630 posted on 07/13/2002 8:33:45 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1624 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
"I never stated that; you are twisting my words"

Really? Let's see...

__________________________________________________

"Most likely because people like you were "Freeping" the poll."

What exactly are "people like you"? People that disagree with this lawsuit? So we shouldn't be allowed to vote?

_______________________________________________

"You can vote in these polls, but I just hope that the people at JW realize this when they view the results."

So you are saying that our vote should count for less, or be discounted because we don't happen to vote the way you or Larry would?

_______________________________________________

"I never said that, you can vote if you want to. The poll just is not accurate because of the number of "Freeps".

You have posted this theory several times even though several people have verified that we were only allowed to "casted" our vote once. No matter how many times you post it, it doesn't make it true.

_________________________________________________

""Second, do you REALLY think that OVER 1500 PEOPLE read this thread and scooted over there late last night just to make this poll look bad???"

"Yes."

Seriously, there were maybe 25-30 posters total on this thread. It's been well established that we could only "casted" our vote once. Next...

___________________________________________________

"Well, since that's not the case, let's go back to the original subject of someone on this thread deliberately posting the link to this poll in order to maliciously sway the results."

Now we're malicious because we dared to vote once in one of Larry's polls?

_________________________________________________

Signed,

A lazy, malicious, complaining derelict.

1,631 posted on 07/13/2002 8:34:50 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1575 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I agree. It probably had tons of folks hit it with YES. I was only able to vote NO once, but it allowed me multiple YES, must be broke, darnit.
1,632 posted on 07/13/2002 8:34:53 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1627 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
You're Christian Witness needs improvement too. So much for iron sharpening iron eh?
1,633 posted on 07/13/2002 8:35:36 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1623 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
And when the results changed, the HONEST thing to do would've been revise his press release...but who cares about HONESTY when your motives are pure?

Honestly, thanks for being so honest, Amelia. :)

Well, that was honest!

1,634 posted on 07/13/2002 8:36:20 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1629 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Thus proving the point that if you voted "yes" you were allowed back in to view the results, and if you voted "no" you were not.

Case closed.
1,635 posted on 07/13/2002 8:36:21 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1583 | View Replies]

To: deport
It is always nice to know that I have your approval, DEPORT.

Good-night.

1,636 posted on 07/13/2002 8:37:01 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1618 | View Replies]

To: deport
Thank you for proving my point that there were maybe 25 - 30 total posters on this thread.
1,637 posted on 07/13/2002 8:37:25 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1584 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
Seriously, there were maybe 25-30 posters total on this thread. It's been well established that we could only "casted" our vote once. Next...

Which corresponds well with the 26-30 additional votes recorded after the link was posted...including several "YES" votes, by the way.........

1,638 posted on 07/13/2002 8:37:51 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1631 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
But Rebeckie, there were only 26 additional votes made after I voted and posted the results.... which was only two minutes after the link was posted.... Not that many people would have voted in the two minutes..... So the poll was losing already.... No I don't frequently the watch web site that often. I do go there to look for material when something is in question but daily, no way.
1,639 posted on 07/13/2002 8:37:51 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1620 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
No JW groupies were "stacking" the polls.
1,640 posted on 07/13/2002 8:38:12 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1630 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,6201,621-1,6401,641-1,660 ... 3,801-3,815 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson