This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
12:57PM Halliburton responds to Judicial Watch lawsuit (HAL) by Michael Baron Halliburton (HAL) is off 30 cents, or 2.1 percent, to $13.82, in midday action. The company is out with a press release responding to a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a Washington, D.C.-based legal watchdog group. The suit alleges fraudulent accounting practices at Halliburton took place during the period when current vice president Dick Cheney served as its chairman and CEO. Halliburton called the claims in the suit, "untrue, unsupported, and unfounded." The company continued: "We are working diligently with the SEC to resolve its questions regarding the company's accounting procedures. Halliburton has always followed and will continue to follow guidelines established by the SEC and GAAP, General Accepted Accounting Principles."
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: vpdickcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020, 1,021-1,040 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
No one tells me to say anything. I will stand up against unfairness when I see it.
Whasssa matter.... can't others stand up against unfairness when they see it such as this farce against the VP? Or is that only a oneway street for 'eWW' and your buds over at the watch?
To: deport
Unless something changes in the outcome of the normal JW law suitOh, but this is NOT one of Larry's normal lawsuits; this one won't be hiden in a box of documents in his office.
He's playing with the big boys now, costing Halliburton money every second this crap floats around in the air.
As I said before, I hope he has his house in order.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Larry Klayman and the staff of Judicial Watch have always possessed the virtue of integrity in my eyes. LOL! I don't doubt THAT for a MINUTE!! LOL!!!
To: FreedominJesusChrist
WoW! I am really impressed with your post.
Order the Illusion Watch. An authentic JW watch with disappearing and reappearing logo on the face. Black leather bands, black face with silver accents.
It's only $40.00 from the Judicial Watch Store. What a deal, huh?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Do you understand what his basis for the case is? It is an interpretation of cost plus billing.Big deal.
All he would have to do is reconcile the 10-K's from the SEC with the tax returns from the IRS.So, why hasn't he got that info before he makes the claim that Cheney is liable to be impeached? its a wild claim best left for the fringe.Larry barely knows the law, and now is going to tell all that he undestands cost accounting as well?
Where are the Dems big guns, say David Boies?? I'd think that a bigtime Dem lawyer would salivate at a chance to play partisan hatchet man, if all Larry says is so.
If.
"If" has been the JW motto since 1996.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Well, since you agree with Larry's remarks and think they're virtuous, those of us who KNOW better can judge you as lacking integrity.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
It takes integrity to not slander someone's name before all the evidence has come out in court.
Why don't you tell your buds over at the watch the same thing? You do have buds over don't you?
To: habs4ever
I'll take a guess: no money in it.
To: All
To: Howlin
I'll take a guess: no money in it. Get out .. really
1,010
posted on
07/11/2002 7:54:19 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: tgslTakoma
Did you hear that TroutStalker is in the hospital, too?
To: deport
I'd really put my money on the VP's lawyers and friends not the folks over at the watch and their posting buds.Ordinarily, I would agree, but I sense something more in this unprovoked attack by Judicial Watch, something Satanic!!!
1,012
posted on
07/11/2002 7:56:13 PM PDT
by
ned
To: habs4ever; FreedominJesusChrist
A post from up the thread.......
I was surfing around the Washington Times today and one article an interesting little tidbit:
The suit says Halliburton and Andersen violated securities laws when they did not disclose and justify the accounting change in a letter to investors. Halliburton's financial statements starting in 1998 do note, however, that it was booking uncollected revenue from cost overruns.
854 posted on 7/11/02 7:06 PM Central by Lady In Blue
Whoooooops.... the girl can't help it
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Monica Lewinksy also managed to stay alive too. Ron Brown didn't.
To: Amelia
Thanks,Amelia! That's too funny!
To: ned
From God's mouth to my monitor.
To: Clara Lou
Ann Coulter has played "kissy face" with Larry Klayman because Klayman can pay HUGE amounts of dollars to her. With $26,000,000 +++++ in revenues, JW is well able to influence Coulter's opinions, or so it seems.
To: rdavis84
That's one of the most ridiculous efforts at defense that's been on here yet. Isn't that also true for Enron's/Lay's case as well? Or did they turn their Trick Machine off when they worked with Halliburton and Cheney? That was not a defense that was a statement of fact. However my question still stands. What is it that Halliburton and Cheney did that is illegal?
To: Howlin
I kind of thought so too! hehehe
To: ned
Ordinarily, I would agree, but I sense something more in this unprovoked attack by Judicial Watch, something Satanic!!! Mr. & Mrs. Anti-Christ and there merry gang of thugs???
1,020
posted on
07/11/2002 8:08:37 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020, 1,021-1,040 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson