Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tape Shows Officers Restraining Suspect With Force: Excessive Force Or Justified Restraint?
MyCFNow ^

Posted on 07/10/2002 10:21:02 AM PDT by HarryDunne

OKLAHOMA CITY -- The Oklahoma City Police Department said it would investigate to determine if two metro police officers used excessive force in restraining a man who was being apprehended for allegedly soliciting a prostitute.

See The Videotape

Police responded to the scene after receiving a tip from Brian Bates, who calls himself the Video Vigilante. Bates called police after he saw a man named Donald Pete get into a truck with a woman Bates believed was a prostitute.

In an arrest captured on video, Officer Greg Driskell ordered everyone out of the truck, including the woman and Pete.

On the tape, Driskill is heard asking Pete about something in his mouth. Then, Driskill ordered Pete to the ground. Bates said Driskill started striking Pete when he didn't move.

"He wasn't fighting or resisting. He just wasn't getting on the ground, so the officer pulled out his baton and started whaling on the guy," Bates said.

SURVEY

Were officers justified in using batons and pepper spray in arresting the suspect? Yes No I can't tell because we don't have all the facts

Results | Disclaimer

Driskill hit Pete several times and used pepper spray, but Pete still seemed uncooperative, the tape showed. Moments later, Officer E.J. Dyer showed up and offered assistance and both officers began using their batons, Bates said.

"I don't know why it turned into, 'Let's beat the guy to death,'" Bates said. "The officers asked me what should have happened. In my opinion they got the guy out. He wasn't fighting. The officers weren't in any harm. (They should have) backed away, drawn their weapons and waited for backup."

Capt. Jessica Cummins said the video may seem intense to some, but said the public should look at it from the officers' points of view and remember that Pete weighs 300 pounds.

"It might seem extreme. It might seem improper for what the officer was doing and them having to use their batons. But you have to remember how the officers are trained," Cummins said. "What the officers are concerned about is their safety. They are trying to make an arrest of an individual who is not listening or cooperating."

Cummins said the department is investigating, but that it could be several days before they determine if the use of force was too extreme or justifiable.

Pete was booked into the Oklahoma County Jail on several charges, including assault and battery, assault and battery of a police officer, resisting arrest, and engaging in an act of lewdness.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; policebeating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
Watch the video
1 posted on 07/10/2002 10:21:02 AM PDT by HarryDunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
This should take you directly to the video
2 posted on 07/10/2002 10:21:52 AM PDT by HarryDunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
Police responded to the scene after receiving a tip from Brian Bates, who calls himself the Video Vigilante. Bates called police after he saw a man named Donald Pete get into a truck with a woman Bates believed was a prostitute.

This is the part of the story that really pissed me off. WTF is this Video Vigilante.

3 posted on 07/10/2002 10:25:04 AM PDT by ChicagoRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
What does that video show? It looks like nothing to me. Certainly not anything like the clear police assault that took place in Inglewood, CA.
4 posted on 07/10/2002 10:26:06 AM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
How many times did the cop say "GET ON THE GROUND".
5 posted on 07/10/2002 10:30:11 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
The Inglewood video is more cut and dried.
6 posted on 07/10/2002 10:34:08 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoRepublican
He's probably a guy tired of prossies doing tricks in his neighborhood. Wouldn't you?

Regards, Lurking'

7 posted on 07/10/2002 10:35:18 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; TheOtherOne
The cop does say numerous times "get on the ground". Does that justify the cop's actions? While he had the man on the ground, he kicked him in the head at least twice, he hit him repeatedly with the baton and he sprayed him with what looks like pepper spray.
8 posted on 07/10/2002 10:37:04 AM PDT by HarryDunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
It looks like they asked him to get on the ground and he did. Then the officer said get up and he did. Then said to get down. Its like some bizarre version of musical chairs.
I couldn't see the guy resisting, just asking what was going on. Cop kept on yelling "spit it out!" for some reason and then starts hitting him with something (looks like whipping motions, but hard to tell). Knees him in the back a couple of times.
What could the guy have done to cooperate more? He was just lying there on the ground like the cop said.
9 posted on 07/10/2002 10:38:37 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
Okay - first of all the initial responding officer is not only extremely lucky - but one dumb sob.

it is clearly obvious that this man was far superior in strength that the officer - a fact that could have lead to sever injury and/or death for the officer had Mr. Pete decided to do so. maintaining contact with Mr. Pete is his grevious error - backing away and waiting for back-up is the "I like my life" decision here. - not the "i'm a stud decision that was made"....
As for the use of force - I don't see that it was necessary - no officer was in immediate harm - Mr. Pete never once made a threatening move (that I saw) - he simply rufused to comply - which isn't enough to justify the use of a baton. Waiting for backup and overpowering Mr. Pete is the sensible, correct decision.

Give me damn break - like I said - if this guy would have wanted to - he could have had cop for lunch.

10 posted on 07/10/2002 10:40:08 AM PDT by phasma proeliator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoRepublican
This is the part of the story that really pissed me off. WTF is this Video Vigilante.

Did you see the part where the video guy drops the camera to give the police officer his stick

11 posted on 07/10/2002 10:40:43 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
The kid in Inglewood was slammed against the car and punched while his hands were cuffed behind his back.

The man in this video is resisting and is not cuffed.

I think as long as you are a legitimate threat to the officer or you are resisting arrest, you're going to get rough up in response.

Seems pretty simple to me.

12 posted on 07/10/2002 10:46:37 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
The cop does say numerous times "get on the ground". Does that justify the cop's actions?

To me it clearly states that the guy put police officers at risk because at that point they were unsure of his intentions. Force must be used in cases where normal restraint is not possible. This includes when a person refuses to get down or put their hands behind their backs. I do not agree with brutality of any kind but cops must work on instinct more then the average person.

13 posted on 07/10/2002 10:47:26 AM PDT by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lelio
What could the guy have done to cooperate more?

I agree this cop went WAY over board but at the same time the man was resisting arrest .. you can see when he is on the ground that he is fighting to keep is hands in front

My next question is .. what alerted the police office to order the man to the ground

My next question would be .. this cop didn't realize someone was taping him ????

14 posted on 07/10/2002 10:48:22 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
"Get on the ground", meant lie down on your stomach and quit trying to get up; and in context, it was clear that the so-called victim understood what conduct was desired.

He didn't want to be cuffed, and didn't want to obey. The officer is not safe until the guy is cuffed...

THis is nothing like the kid from the other day, who was suffed an floppy, getting slammed and punched in the face.

This guy needed to be cuffed, and they were right to spray and whack him until he complied.
15 posted on 07/10/2002 10:48:49 AM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoRepublican
According to this courttv.com the Video Vigilante Brian Bates is a person that films prostitution activity in the Oklahoma City area as to either show it to the cops or mail it to the wives of the husbands involved.
16 posted on 07/10/2002 10:50:43 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarryDunne
There is wrong on both sides of this.
17 posted on 07/10/2002 10:52:59 AM PDT by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Did you see the part where the video guy drops the camera to give the police officer his stick

I caught that too. Mr. Video will be lucky if he's not named in the civil suit for aiding and abetting the cop.

18 posted on 07/10/2002 10:53:14 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
I don't see him as resisting arrest, he had his arms out from his body. Based on the size difference the cop couldn't of pulled his arms behind his back; plus based on his size I doubt if he could have gotten his arms back there.
Poster phasma had it right: the person was posing no threat and the cop should of called for backup before engaging. There's an obvious size disadvantage which you shouldn't try and overcome by beating him with a baton. Its just common sense.
19 posted on 07/10/2002 10:54:38 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SarahW
Thats what I saw too. He did not want to be cuffed and was resisting the attempts to be cuffed.
20 posted on 07/10/2002 10:54:52 AM PDT by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson