Why do you feel you must put words in my mouth? You seem to have many preconceived notions. Let me make it brief, as I see you have little interest in an intelligent dialogue.
Where do you see in ANY of my posts ANY support for either Cashill or Sanders as you state? Perhaps you can enlighten the readers here.
The fact of the matter is, I have been, and continue to be critical of BOTH Mr. Cashill and James Sanders.
Whoops. My mistake. I was thinking of this article
TWA 800 - St. Louis Dog Exercise Exposed As Red Herring which I found after reading the article you linked me to. The article I was reading was part 1, and your article was part 2, but they weren't from the same series. I didn't catch that until you pitched your fit this morning.
Glad to hear you don't trust Cashill and Sanders. In this case, however, I think you would be in full agreement with their article, as it is almost a mirror of the article you linked me to. Both ominously suggest that if the bomb sniffing exercise took place on the 747 next to the TWA 800 aircraft then the whole NTSB investigation is flawed and needs to be reevaluated. Apparently, they too believe it is impossible that a similar exercise ever took place on TWA 800, and there must be a better explaination for the otherwise unexplainable dispersion of trace elements of PETN and RDX at different points throughout the aircraft.