Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema
Dr. Curtis Cook, an OBGYN specialist for women with problem pregnancies, said he and his medical colleagues have never seen any reason for a partial-birth abortion to protect a woman's health.

"Never in the twenty years I have been providing perinatal care to women with complicated pregnancies have I ever experienced a clinical situation where [partial-birth abortion] has ever been required or even considered," Cook explained.

This needs to be repeated every single time someone brings up the mother's "health" as a reason for PBA. There is NO medical reason for the procedure. Problem pregnancies can be ended just as surely by delivering the baby alive.

The only reason for partial birth abortion is to make sure the baby is dead. I do not understand why the woman in this story had a partial birth abortion, since her baby had died in utero. I suspect she had a D & E instead (dilation and evacuation).

11 posted on 07/10/2002 10:21:18 AM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: knuthom; BibChr
Even abortionists, at least in their more candid moments, recognize this.

To do this [PBA] was called a "version & breech delivery." This was abandoned decades ago as it was too dangerous. Instead today the much safer Cesarean Section is used. Dr. Warren Hern, author of the late term abortion medical text said, "I would dispute any statement that this is the safest procedure to use. The procedure can cause amniotic fluid embolism or placental abruption." AMA News, Nov. 20, 1995, p. 3

Other testimony:

Dr. Pamela Smith, Director of Medical Education, Dept. of Ob-Gyn at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Chicago, has stated: "There are absolutely no obstetrical situations encountered in this country which would require partial- birth abortion to preserve the life or health of the mother." And she adds two more risks: cervical incompetence in subsequent pregnancies caused by three days of forceful dilation of the cervix, and uterine rupture caused by rotating the fetus in the womb.

Joseph DeCook, Fellow, Am. Col., Ob/Gyn, founder of PHACT (Physicians Ad Hoc Coalition for Truth), stated: "There is no literature that testifies to the safety of partial birth abortions. It’s a maverick procedure devised by maverick doctors who wish to deliver a dead fetus. Such abortions could lead to infection causing sterility."

Also, "Drawing out the baby in breech position is a very dangerous procedure and could tear the uterus. Such a ruptured uterus could cause the mother to bleed to death in ten minutes.".."The puncturing of the child’s skull produces bone shards that could puncture the uterus." (Congressman Charles Canady (R-FL)

"There are no medical circumstances in which a partial-birth abortion is the only safe alternative. We take care of pregnant women who are very sick, and babies who are very sick, and we never perform partial-birth abortions. . . . There are plenty of alternatives. . . . This is clearly a procedure no obstetrician needs to do." F. Boehm, Dr. OB, Vanderbilt U. Med. The Washington Times, May 6, 1966, p. A1

For more information about PHACT and partial-birth abortion, click here

14 posted on 07/10/2002 10:41:26 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson