[JohnFiorentino]

The document indicates that investigators had "little forensic documentation or guidance on large-body aircraft missile engagements, and no supportable mechanical or operational explanation for the crash." (Declassified Brookhaven National Laboratories FBI report, 1997)

Mr. Barr says....."ALL of the material damage experts who have examined the wreckage agree with Tobin."

The report goes on to say, that the initial metallurgical findings were reviewed, stating: A "cursory metallurgical peer review was conducted......" The report further states however, "No analysis or microscopic examinations were conducted."

Would you care to name any other metallurgists who examined or re-examined the TWA800 wreckage and fully concur with William Tobin? Can you advise us when these examinations and re-examinations took place? Can you advise us where we might obtain copies of these examinations or re-examinations? Can you advise us where we might obtain copies of documents relating to William Tobin's analysis of the TWA800 wreckage? Can you advise us where we might find documents relating to Mr. Tobin's analysis of the recrystallization of aluminum on the rear spar of the CWT? Can you tell us where we might find documentation relating to Mr. Tobin's examination of the overhead bin from Fl800 as alluded to in your prior postings? Can you provide us with information relating to Mr. Tobin's prior aircrash examinations? Specifically where any prior aircraft were submerged in seawater for several weeks or longer prior to examination? Can you tell us where we might obtain additional information regarding the tail number of the airplane where the "dog-training" exercise was allegedly conducted, and upon which the traces of PETN and RDX discovered on the wreckage was said to have come? Can you provide us with information re: Mr. Tobin's expertise relating to forensic evidence which may be indicative of liquid bombs? Can you provide us with documents relating to Mr. Tobin's previous examinations of commercial airliners destroyed by missile engagements?

[Asmodeus]

Donaldson Brothers TWA800 forum
From: John Fiorentino - 14 January 2001
As the author of a forthcoming book on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and in my occupation as a Paralegal, having investigated many "conspiracy" theories, it would seem the first step would be to prove conclusively that TWA Flight 800 was IN FACT downed by a missile or missiles. [emphasis yours]

It's obviously long past time for you to practice what you preach and "prove conclusively" that Flight 800 was IN FACT the victim of a suitcase bomb. It should go without saying that if you could have done so by now, you would have.

Only one person has ever supported your daffy suitcase bomb theory.

Yahoo TWA800 forum
From: "reednfolink"
Date: Sat Jul 13, 2002 8:14 pm
Dear Asmodeus/Elmer, First of all, I really appreciate your efforts in getting me kicked off "Free Republic"! Didn't suprise me at all! It was predictable! I don't know whether "you" are a think tank, a propaganda front for the trial lawyers or just a brainwashed SUCKER! Only thing that matters to me is that you are a BACKSTABBING COWARD. I notice quite some time has elapsed since Mr. Fiorentino's post #38, asking you to provide some simple answers re: TWA 800. I asked you the same questions back in March of 2002. Funny, though, that all of my posts were removed by your moderator buddies- only your 100 liner pastes and Rokkes patronizing dribble remains.(for the most part) What other schemes or dirty tricks will Barr/Asmodeus employ to futher his agenda? BEWARE! [emphasis his]

Interestingly, there doesn't appear to be any such member in the Yahoo TWA800 forum. But, of course, any member can post with any name they wish after signing in. You, of course, are a member there. Would you do such a deceitful thing to try to show that you do have some support for your suitcase bomb theory?

By clicking here the readers can see for themselves that you are adept at nice and tidy HTML coding - when you want to be. By clicking here the readers can see for themselves that you don't always want to be neat and tidy with your HTML coding. Interestingly, you included the following in the midst of your supposed review of an official report.

[quote]TOBIN: I was ordered to.......But it was in a very emotional, very frenzied manner, so I inquired as to why.....I was told.......which again flies in the face of my interpretation of whose aircraft this was.......But, so I inquired as to why........And I said, well I'm still missing some critical information, why.......And my response at that point was, well I'm still missing some critical information. Why.........And I was told, yes, we want that overhead bin and I was continued -- told to go find that overhead bin. [end quote]

You conveniently deleted Tobin's repeated references to the fact that the "overhead bin" was reportedly in pristine condition. That's the "critical information" he referred to. A suitcase bomb that detonates in an overhead bin could not leave that overhead bin in pristine condition.

Your paper trail includes abundant evidence that you ask lots of questions but do not answer questions you are asked. When coupled with the fact that you routinely deceitfully spin, distort and fabricate information and answers you receive, you obviously had no constructive purpose in the barrage of questions you included in your last posting here.

Simply put, you have demolished your own credibility as a supposedly "sincere seeker of the truth" - with everybody [except, of course, "reednfolink"]