Well, I've been reading some of your postings and in one of them, It says "I have less faith in juries than I do in the Clintons."
I know since I've been here we've seen some people defend the Clintons and try to explain away some of their mistakes. My beef is not so much with people addressing these things so much as it is people who are coming on to message boards and defending the idiots like Katie Couric and Dan Blabber and others and saying that those news outlets are fair and balanced. You know as well as I do they are not.
And then to go and add the murder analogy into this and place into the same category is absolutely stupid, idiotic and foolish. These news organizations ARE NOT ON OUR SIDE!!!!!! If they were, they'd be proving Bill and Hillary and their actions tooinstead of cozying up to them. I've been researching media bias for the last several years and the evidence of media bias is hard and very clear.
Surely, people like you would recognize that and would have a very different perception. The news and information consumers of this country are being done a tremendous disservice by NBC and the other established media organizations.
You should at least give some consderation to these things before you start carrying around this idea that your viewpoint is the only accptable one and any others are not acceptable and should not be allowed. his kind of attitude is unaccptable and is why people like myself do not watch NBC or any of the other establised news media outlets.
Regards
my comment on juries comes from my experiance serving on a jury, juries don't work in any trial more complicated than petty shoplifting. But that is another discussion. I have no confidance in the Clintons.
The media might not be friendly to conservatives, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
The consequences of corporate fraud have to be so massive that no one would consiter doing, if a billionare knows he can lose EVERYTHING and spend the rest of his natural life in prison. What are the consequences of corporate fraud?
A slap on the wrist from the SEC and a share holder lawsuit that tort reform has made a moot threat.
Defrauding the American people of billions of dollars has no consequences, and the Bush plan is just more of the same.
oooh, depriving multi-billionares of their pay cheque and kicking them off the board of directors of publically traded companies. More time on the golf course and a tax write off, now that is going to bring them to their knees.
The probability of the Enron, Global Crossing and Worldcom executives seeing the inside of a court house let alone a jail cell.
If you know you can defraud the American people of billions and billions and billions of dollars and not face any material consequnces what is to stop the Ken Lays of the world from stealing from the American people?