[Rheo]

If Faulkner can definitely say that she was there since 2/1-2/4...why didn't Dusek call him?

If Faulkner can say there is no way to tell if it was 2/4 or 2/16..why wouldn't Dusek call him?

What are the other reasons Dusek would not call Faulkner, the guy who was at the autopsy?..(besides his testimony affirming the defense?)

[John Jamieson]

Because he got the wrong answer: Not before 2/16!

[UCANSEE2]

What are the other reasons Dusek would not call Faulkner, the guy who was at the autopsy?..(

My guess is that there was nothing he could say that would be beneficial to the prosecution.

He had no cause of death, no evidence of DW's DNA or other bodily fluids in/on Danielle. Not much he could do for Dusek.