Skip to comments.
New evidence implicates Westerfield: (Dusek Fires Final Shot?) Trial Thread, July 10, 2002
Union Trib ^
| July 10, 2002
| Steve Perez/Greg Magnus
Posted on 07/09/2002 8:35:39 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,001-1,018 next last
To: Rheo
Also have wondered how a missing left foot, might fit with a car accident. Could more than just the foot be missing?
To: hoosiermama
Basically I think what they are saying is: The fibers may come from "XXX" towels. You may have one, I may have one. Who knows exactly which towel they came from, since we both purchased them at the local Wally World? (Or something like that??)
BINGO! That is exactly right! Also, the fiber gal said she was out to collect those fibers that had shown up in DW's house/MH but not at VD's (blue/grey and orange) she did not concern herself with the source or did not reveal it most likely because it was too common. Another thought since we don't know what the dog bed looked like and, it was thrown away the night of the crime, since Danielle reportly wrestled w/ dog if orange fibers were from dog bed then at cookie visit she had to have had orange and blue/grey fibers on her, ran thru house (transfer) DW loads and rides in MH (secondary transfer). They would not find the fibers in VD house because DVD threw away dog bed and cleaned the floors.
To: John Jamieson
I thought about the blue paint...by why would Boyce ask that of Keene....Keene was adamant there were no parts there.??
63
posted on
07/09/2002 10:33:16 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: John Jamieson
Going by the ME...car accident doesn't fit with the evidence of her body...who knows.
I wondered if she wasn't dragged by the foot to her final resting spot and due to decomposition..it came off....left there and animals took it.??
64
posted on
07/09/2002 10:35:46 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: alexandria
They would not find the fibers in VD house because DVD threw away dog bed and cleaned the floors. Not only cleaned the floors, but vacuumed (what a helpful husband), and then removed the dirt bag from the vacuum and DISCARDED it, sometime before police arrived.
I know that all husbands are so thoughtful, that when they vacuum, they always remember to discard the dirt bag ! RIGHT LADIES !!?!?!?!?!?!?!
65
posted on
07/09/2002 10:36:39 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: Lower55
There were only looking for one thing in that house, Essence of Westerfield.
To: alexandria
It is odd to me also that no dog hairs were found on her bedding.
You have a little girl who wrestles with her dog..gets scratched even...secondary transfers throughout her own home..but no dog hairs on her bedding.
67
posted on
07/09/2002 10:37:24 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: UCANSEE2
But...BVD testified that DVD DOES NOT clean the house or vacuum.
68
posted on
07/09/2002 10:38:16 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: alexandria
Since I haven't been here from the begining, can someone fill me in on what happened to the dog?
To: Rheo
Blue paint under the fingernails, or on the car bumpers, or both?
To: Rheo
She must not have been in her bed that night.
71
posted on
07/09/2002 10:41:16 PM PDT
by
Lower55
To: Rheo
Going by the ME.....
That couple in Texas who murdered their 4 year daughter would still be serving life.
But, dogs did it and the parents served only 5 years each.
To: John Jamieson
There were only looking for one thing in that house, Essence of Westerfield.
That's the odor Bren was emitting that fateful night......
Pepe' La' Pew!!
73
posted on
07/09/2002 10:43:45 PM PDT
by
FresnoDA
To: John Jamieson
Strange huh?...can't imagine the defense TRYING to place painted bumpers in DW's house so it matches the blue paint under her fingernails.
Can't figure out what it means.
74
posted on
07/09/2002 10:45:00 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
Under California law, is the prosecution REQUIRED to turn over any exculpatory evidence that they find, or can they just gnore it?
Seems to me the clues from the body are really few and far between.
To: Rheo
ALRIGHT, since every bit of real evidence just completely confuses any attempts to figure out what happened, I am going to have to spill the beans.
ALIENS abducted Danielle and did experiments. Similar to the cow experiments where they remove sex organs and the like.
They were going house to house with this transporter on their ship, and it kinda would vacuum up loose particles suspended in the air (like carpet fibers, hair, etc.) This cross-contaminated several houses in the area. They didn't take DW's son because he was watching Porno at the time, so they didn't consider his sex organs as 'virgin'.
DW was out at the bar while all this happened. Damon was asleep in front of the TV. The dog went crazy and tore up it's dog bed, mainly due to the high-frequency sound of the hovering UFO.
Of course the VD boys did see it but they were too scared to tell, and will have latent memories of it after they get much older.
Damon started to wake up, but the aliens hit him with the SOMBER RAY, sometimes known as the BUMMER RAY. This caused him to feel sleepy again, and when the pizza partiers came home later and woke him up, he wasn't really up to them staying long.
So they left, and since they were smoking dope, they all thought that the UFO they saw hovering above other houses in the neighborhood when they were coming back from the bar was probably due to the pot, they all decided to make up stories, as they didn't want to be known as TIN FOILERS, or UFO FREAKS.
76
posted on
07/09/2002 10:47:11 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: Lower55
She must not have been in her bed that nightOr any night recently...or the bedding had been washed..or Danielle just didn't have or get the dog hairs in her bedding.
BVD said the dog had peed in Danielles room within days of her disappearance so the dog had supposedly been in the room..that's why the steam cleaner was supposedly in the MB.
Another oddity without answers.
77
posted on
07/09/2002 10:48:04 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
Could have been one of Feldman's tricks, he's been very good at trying to trip witnesses up with left field questions.
To: Rheo
BVD testified that DVD DOES NOT clean the house or vacuum. Well, apparently there are A LOT OF THINGS Damon did at home that BRENDA didn't know about!
79
posted on
07/09/2002 10:48:24 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
To: John Jamieson
Good point....no way to prove or disprove tho with the info we have now....is there?
80
posted on
07/09/2002 10:49:33 PM PDT
by
Rheo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,001-1,018 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson