Skip to comments.
BREAKING: BRENDA VAN DAM DANCED WITH WESTERFIELD: (Modern Day Westside Story?)7-9-02 Trial Watch
KFMB ^
| July 9, 2002
| KFMB
Posted on 07/08/2002 10:23:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,281-1,292 next last
To: All
Did Jeff Graham testify to any new info?...or just to say that DW was excluded from any prints in the VD home?..where did Jeff go with the unidentified palm prints?...anything else?
481
posted on
07/09/2002 12:53:56 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: crystalk
What are we then to say of Damon VD, however, who surely must be the main reason for a 7-year-old girl not to be a virgin.Are you just spouting or do you know for a fact that she was not a virgin?
482
posted on
07/09/2002 12:55:41 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: Rheo
That they were only interested in if the prints matched David Westerfield. Also they didn't check the prints against each other. What a coinkydinkle.
483
posted on
07/09/2002 12:55:52 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: jacquej
Of course DW is not a "middle-aged bachelor," but had twice been married, and had more or less successfully raised a son and a daughter to adulthood.
To: Jaded
That not matcing the unID'd prints is mind boggling..wouldn't they even want to know if they have 1 unID'd print throughout the house or 16 different ones.??
And just how many people were by Danielle's room that were not on the parents list or LEO's??..
485
posted on
07/09/2002 1:00:33 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Rheo
Oh just the usual unidentified prints and not trying to match them against each other. Just trivial stuff. Nothing to see there, move along...(sarcasm) Actually, I was gone for his testimony. Would have loved to have heard it. Mz. Bloomingidiot said something about the closet, but I had the TV turned way down because her voice causes my dog to howl!
486
posted on
07/09/2002 1:01:07 PM PDT
by
Jrabbit
To: Rheo
I agree completely. If your goal is to find the killer of this little girl, don't you check every print? I do not understand what the SDPD was doing!
To: JudyB1938
Well, Judy, there are reasons for the questions, and it is to exclude those who would continually make trouble.
While I am sure you aren't the guilty party, someone managed to get on from here, and was reporting back to certain people here what the conversation was over there, and people started getting nasty Freepmails regarding their comments.
This, in my opinion, comes pretty close to 'net stalking, and it is why those asking for permission to read the board, or post to the board must be "cleared"...
Not to exclude well-meaning people, but to exclude these stalkers, trouble-makers, and people who are more interested in attacking posters who do not share their point of view.
488
posted on
07/09/2002 1:05:01 PM PDT
by
jacquej
To: Jrabbit
but I had the TV turned way down because her voice causes my dog to howlYour poor dog....thank you for being so kind to animals as to not subject them to annoying media heads.
489
posted on
07/09/2002 1:06:11 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: jacquej
They claimed one case 3 years ago, how could it be just "recent". More lies.
To: crystalk
ltns!
491
posted on
07/09/2002 1:06:30 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: crystalk
I meant "middle-aged bachelor" to describe his present unmarried state, not to assert that he had never been married...
492
posted on
07/09/2002 1:06:51 PM PDT
by
jacquej
To: Spunky
Serious medical information has been presented on these threads time and again, that shows that Danielle had a number of physical as well as psychological indicators for precocious sexual activity. This included budding breasts at age 7, and a vaginal discharge and distention.
I am only repeating what I have already read on here. The hypothesis of sexual activity is by far the most likely (occams razor, remember) to explain these phenomena, and the type of home she lived in would almost make it inevitable...
Whose ARE all these prints all over the house including Danielle's room? Adult women, adult men, all unidentified.
To: Jrabbit
and here I thought all along it was your dog's howling that mine were responding to...
Now I know who to balme for all the noise around here!
494
posted on
07/09/2002 1:10:24 PM PDT
by
jacquej
To: GoldenBear
I just don't get it either.
You have techs come thru and print on 2/3 and 2/4...unidentified prints are found..then someone goes back on 2/13 and hydro tests..more are found.
They don't check them against each other...a sexual offender database might have been good...Did they sit the parents down and say..Look, we need you to think a little harder on your list of people as we have unidentified prints on her desk in her room and the door outside of her bedroom, from where she was supposedly taken!
Somebody had better look into the SDPD's handling of crime scenes and investigations...something stinks.
495
posted on
07/09/2002 1:11:31 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: crystalk
Let's add nailbiting, nosepicking (frequent nosebleeds), and some of poor little Danielle's on-camera behavior, covering her little budding breasts, etc... to the list of behaviors not seen in a healthy happy and well-adjusted innocent 7 year old.
That poor child.
496
posted on
07/09/2002 1:14:03 PM PDT
by
jacquej
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"You really should... all comedy and tragedy aside, it's easier to contain it all and look at it at leisure rather than hunt and search for it throught the threads. ya silly goose. :- )"Kim, with all due respect, and I'm saying this with the best of intentions--if you don't like how Fresno posts on his own threads (i.e., the ones he starts), then why on this good earth don't you go start another thread that suits you? Or, I know what, tomorrow why don't you start the thread?
To: Rheo
They had already decided DW was guilty and bascially were just waiting for the body to showup at Glamis. How inconvient that it did not.
To: Rheo
What's interesting about the way they handled this investigation is that they let the family back in the house the next day, 2/3. The house that was a crime scene. In the Jahi Turner case, SDLE put the parents up in a hotel for a week while the sealed the crime scene. What the heck is up with that? Why the glaring differences?
499
posted on
07/09/2002 1:15:59 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: All
Feldman was going for the scratches on the leg..not back.
Where did he get the leg info from?...DW?....if so..she had been scratched prior to cookie day, altho that does not put blood in the RV as it wasn't there.
BVD has been stressing Tues as cookie day....DW has said it was Wed or Thur...next door neighbor mentions Friday.....somehow the dog scratch and cookie day tie in but I'm not clear how....help this dimwit out please.
500
posted on
07/09/2002 1:17:43 PM PDT
by
Rheo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,281-1,292 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson