Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Discuss among yourselves.
1 posted on 07/05/2002 7:21:05 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: aculeus
I am too verklempt.
2 posted on 07/05/2002 7:22:40 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
"It's too late to change now."
                         --The Vatican
3 posted on 07/05/2002 7:26:22 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
This smells an awful lot like the Anglicans trying to justify their priestesses after the fact.
4 posted on 07/05/2002 7:29:19 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
However it plays out, you would never find Islam working to elevate the role of women in the church.
5 posted on 07/05/2002 7:30:02 PM PDT by Neever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
As Junia, she was described by St Paul in a letter to the Romans as “prominent among the Apostles”.

Access Hollywood described Will Smith as "prominent among the NBA All Stars" - doesn't mean that Will Smith is a basketball player. I am not sold on this theory, although it may be true.
6 posted on 07/05/2002 7:35:52 PM PDT by adakotab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Siobhan; patent; american colleen
FYI BUMP
7 posted on 07/05/2002 7:35:53 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
I think the justification for a celibate priesthood is greater than the justification for an all male priesthood. There are no physical limitations that can keep women from a priestly vocation.
10 posted on 07/05/2002 7:39:51 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Looks to me like someone with an ecclesiastical political agenda in search of scriptural justification to back it up.

I don't buy it.

11 posted on 07/05/2002 7:41:37 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Hmm, Another re-write of history by feminists?
12 posted on 07/05/2002 7:42:14 PM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Now wait a minute.. We have a bonafied "deaconess" in the bible. But they are of course fudging on the female apostle?

Why? What purpose would it serve?

13 posted on 07/05/2002 7:45:26 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
For many Christians this is not news nor is it structurally important. Simply by abolishing the office of Bishop, it is then possible for women to participate fully in church life anyway.

Many Protestant denominations did so in past centuries.

16 posted on 07/05/2002 7:53:02 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
bump
17 posted on 07/05/2002 7:55:42 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Feminism & PC-dom aside, why does it sometimes (often) seem Paul succeed in a 'leveraged buy-out' of the Jewish reformation initiated by Jesus?
19 posted on 07/05/2002 7:59:14 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tiki; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; livius; ...
Ping
21 posted on 07/05/2002 8:08:34 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus; All
My knowledge of Christianity is somewhat smudged by years of intemperate Protestantism following a Catholic childhood, but the Monty Python view of this would no doubt be that she was a groupie, nothing more.
23 posted on 07/05/2002 8:13:50 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
What with the early Christian requirement that male converts be circumcised, I would not be at all surprised that women played a dominant role in the early church. parsy the sensitive.
25 posted on 07/05/2002 8:19:12 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
bump
26 posted on 07/05/2002 8:19:19 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
I'd like to see their Scriptural basis for this. There were 12 Apostles of Jesus. One betrayed him and was replaced (#13). St. Paul is considered an honorary 14th Apostle as he never was acquainted with Jesus in the flesh. There are no more Apostles, male or female. Zero, zip, nada. Where are they getting this?

We already know that women were prominent in the ministry of Jesus. Joanna, Mary Magdalene and other wealthy women were the patronesses of Jesus. We know there were many prominent female disciples and patronesses, but I have never seen anything anywhere naming them as Apostles.

30 posted on 07/05/2002 8:23:01 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
This sounds to me like feminist propoganda!
33 posted on 07/05/2002 8:31:25 PM PDT by Conservative Chicagoan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Wasn't there a female pope at one time?
37 posted on 07/05/2002 8:53:54 PM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson