Just for the hell of it ... let's remind them a second time that it's the GOP who declared abortion "vital" to US population control policies at home and abroad: "Abortion is VITAL to the Solution" ... A Key Point from Kissinger's NSSM-200
As lagniappe ... a post of mine to which Cachelot (of all people) never responded:
Death of a continent (Aids crisis in Africa) ^ |
||||||
Posted by Askel5 to Cachelot On News/Activism ^ Jul 3 9:51 PM #47 of 55 ^ It sounds like what you're saying is that America has purposefully committed genocide by "culling" the African population for purposes of grabbing their resources.No, that's what Kissinger suggested would be a good idea. I'm merely repeating ad infinitum portions of the GOP's national defense policies on population control. Books such as Excessive Force, which I purchased at CPAC from Steven Mosher's table, also are a goldmine of information. Sudan is an excellent example of the the more brutal connection of depopulation to resources which sounds so matter of fact when detailed in policy memoranda such as Carter's GLOBAL 2000 or the motherlode that is Kissinger's NSSM-200/NSDM-314:
Just as Kissinger made no bones (give or take 40 million American unborn) about the fact that abortion was vital to the solution, I'm saying that the US makes no bones about what is and is not in our national interest. Bodies can float like logs out of a bloody Rwanda of blacks run amok which some badass Boy Scout troop could tame and it's an "internal civil conflict into which we cannot intervene". Milosevic allegedly slaughters a mere 40,000 (okay, so that was never proven) and we go in and bust up bridges, target civilian infrastructure and a substantial amount of Collateral Damage and it's a moral war because our almighty National Interests (or those of the Stakeholders, anyway) are on the line.Part One -- Analytical Section -------- ------------------ Chapter I World Demographic Trends Chapter II Population and World Food Supplies Chapter III Minerals and Fuel A bit unclear? Let Brzerzinski have a go:
CHARLIE ROSE: So, we say to the Tibetans, ``You know, we can't do it because we don't want to get into a big deal with China, a fight with China.''And last but certainly not least, as a Bloodhound, I'm happy to direct you to the sorts of Private Corporations (given his stint in Western Africa, Connaught's Thomas Hecht is a steller example of Stakeholder in the proces) of whom Kissinger repeatedly speaks. These Private Concerns -- with the guidance of folks at Rockefeller's daughter's Synergos Institute in conjunction with the World Economic Forum and the Global Philanthropists Circle help direct the billions in pop-control foundation monies from Stakeholders like Baroness Lynda Chalker, Bill Gates, Buffet and Turner to the right Targets. These folks not only underwrite the researchers and academics who rotate out of "public service" (e.g., the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation floating the likes of Piotrow at Johns Hopkins and Foege at the Carter (GLOBAL 2000) Center at Emory) they act as partners of a sort in conjunction with the US, UN, USAID and other agencies charged with managing the "healthcare mechanisms" by which targeted nations could best be fast-tracked toward acceptable reproduction rates. No question but what the argument can be made that the AIDS epidemic is a product of the Blood Industry. Follow the money, as is always the case with "healthcare mechanisms". So, given the evidence of US objectives and means as detailed in NSSM-200/NSDM-314 and carried out to this day -- particularly the protection and continued funding of the exact pharmas responsible for the epidemic -- I do believe the case can be made that the average USAIDS report on the depopulation effects of AIDS on certain African nations may well be a measure of success after all. Despite the patently obvious agenda of so many of its cohorts and partners, even UNFPA's a bit confused, it seems:
Tuesday October 19, 1999 But who can begrudge the abortionists a little gallows humor as they go about their Humanitarian work on behalf of the Living? |
You've got to love Brzerzinski's comment on "like people". If only we could have looked in mirrors at the moment of conception to admire the outline and the utter New Life radiance of our Big Bang. Perhaps we'd have some Human compassion for those absolute innocent lives who've only just arrived on the planet but were remiss in not showing up fully formed and fully clothed so that we Image-Oriented sorts could recognize them as our own.
(By the way ... couldn't help delving into the chessboard when Ziggy came to mind the other night. Saved some interesting links I'll try to massage into a post somewhere, somehow ... =)