I defy you to find the term "Mother Nature" in any of several tens of thousands of pee-reviewed articles in any scientific journal of evolutionary biology.
Talk about your straw-man argument.
Before anyone else gets in a quick joke, please change "pee-reviewed" in the above to "peer-reviewed."
pee-reviewed would apply to, say, anything published by the ICR :-)
'pee-reviewed'? Now that is a Freudian slip that made your statement much more accurate!
Actually, scientists do not give a hoot about evolution. It is only the charlatans of the popular press that keep sticking that evolution garbage everywhere they can. Perhaps they do not talk so much about "Mother" nature, but about nature they sure do. And as to the turning of 'nature' and 'selection' into an atheistic god, the article is right on.