[John H K]

Funny. No proof or documantation about any of it.

As I've stated repeatedly, never ceases to amaze me how creationists repeatedly claim to be more religious than those Godless evolutionists, yet it's the creationists that are repeated bald-faced liars. Somehow, I think you're more likely to burn in Hell for being a liar to that degree, than for daring to suggest that Genesis not be taken literally.

There's no documentation at all, of course, except those hundreds of thousands of fossils found by thousands of evolutionists all over the world spending years and years in the field.

While creationists, by and large, sit at home twiddling their thumbs.

It's interesting, creationists sort of project themselves on evolutionists; they assume that evolutionists all spend all of their days studying and re-studying "Origin of Species" and the collected life and sayings of Darwin or whatever, and never leave the house. In fact, there's actually very little study of "Origin of Species"; evolutionists are too busy running around digging up fossils in the real world, observing animals, and analyzing and discussing them.

[concerned about politics]

As I've stated repeatedly, never ceases to amaze me how creationists repeatedly claim to be more religious than those Godless evolutionists, yet it's the creationists that are repeated bald-faced liars. Somehow, I think you're more likely to burn in Hell for being a liar to that degree, than for daring to suggest that Genesis not be taken literally.

Prove creation is a lie. Prove Darwinism is truth.

To an athiest, no amount of proof is sufficient, not even their own lack of it!
To a Godly believer, no proof is even necessary.

[concerned about politics]

There's no documentation at all, of course, except those hundreds of thousands of fossils found by thousands of evolutionists all over the world spending years and years in the field.

Yes. The thousands of fossils left over from the earth that was, the age before when the dinosaurs were destroyed. There was a "nuclar winter' from an asteroid, causing the ice age. The earth was then was null and void.
God said "Let there be light", and he created the animals and man in the next age, reviving the earth that was destroyed. It's where this age and the Bible starts. It's in the good book. It's already explaned for us.

[staytrue]

Can we have a ban on evolution/creation articles ? Quite frankly, it makes a lot of freepers look like ignorant yahoos. These people make freepers look as ignorant as the catholic church who threatened newton and copernicus with death for arguing the earth was not the center of the universe. Evolutionary theory is a useful theory. It is not completely proven, but it is a useful way of thinking about things. Creationists like to poke holes in it without offering any tangible proof that creationism is correct other than "god said so", "the bible said so", or arguments based only on sophistry and argumentative reasoning.

Even if creationism is true, the facts are so barren to support it, it's like claiming there are little green men on mars. Now there is no proof that little green men don't live on mars but even if there are little green men on mars, the evidence for it is so thin, you look like an idiot for believing in them at the current time. Please keep the creationist people from making FR a laughing stock web site to most modern educated people.