Posted on 07/03/2002 9:53:47 AM PDT by Tomalak
In this walk called Christianity, you'll run acroos people from far differing backgrounds and teachings and experience. Just as some professional sports teams have their 'trash talkers', we got 'em too. They have young, fairly inexperienced players - we do as well. They have guys will bad knees and messed up hands: so do we. And, sometimes, the older players just have to retire - we do as well, with just as much regret and memories as them.
If you can remember the place in the NT where a couple of the disciples wanted to call down 'thunder from Heaven' upon their enemies, Jesus had to rebuke them as well, and THEY had been in His presence for a couple of years.
NIV Matthew 25:41
41. "Then he will say to those on his left, `Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
If you had been in California a few years ago, when the earthquake had dropped a bridge support and cars were running off the end of it to crash, I have no doubt that you would have tried to position yourself in the raodway and try to get people to go a different way.
I won't ask you to be a bit gentle with the new guys (or old ones either) as there is a saying in our circles: "If you want to know what a Christian should be like, just ask someone who ain't."
NIV Psalms 102:18-20
18. Let this be written for a future generation, that a people not yet created may praise the LORD:
19. "The LORD looked down from his sanctuary on high, from heaven he viewed the earth,
20. to hear the groans of the prisoners and release those condemned to death."
I've mentioned this on several of these threads. There is an identical error in the DNA of people, chimps, gorillas, et al., that prevents the formation of ascorbic acid (vitamin C). This mutation is not found in any other mammal. (the only other vitamin-c-dependent animal is the guinea pig, and it has a different mutation blocking the synthesis of ascorbic acid)
The question arises, why? The obvious answer (to me at least) is that all the species inherited it from a common ancestor. Some anti-Evolutionists have countered that it shows the Designer used the same parts in different designs (ignoring what this says about D's quality control), or that it shows that this particular gene in great apes and people is somehow more vulnerable to mutation (ignoring what this says about the human and ape genes being more alike before the mutation, and also ignoring the odds of the *exact same* mutation occuring six times).
More precisely, people, chimps, and the other great apes have been thought to be related since at least Darwin's time on anatomical grounds. Finding the *exact same* mutation in these species is independent evidence of such a relationship.
Do a web search, this is by no means the only case like this
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.