[shezza]

Prosecution unloaded a barrage of objections. They did NOT want this witness to connect these images, some shown in court to the jurors last week, to the teenaged son, NEAL Westerfield.

[shezza]

Many of these images collected in screen prints display bondage.
Morning break for about 15 minutes.

[bvw]

some shown in court to the jurors last week

Mistrial, maybe?

[connectthedots]

Prosecution unloaded a barrage of objections. They did NOT want this witness to connect these images, some shown in court to the jurors last week, to the teenaged son, NEAL Westerfield.

I wonder if the defense improperly phrased the questions in order to elicit all these objections in order to make a point with the jury that the prosecution is being very deceptive and lying about almost everything. If the police are so incompetent that they could not even figure out that Neil was the person downloading the porn, how can the police be trusted to evaluate evidence in a case that is much more difficult to determine. The prosecutor would have been better off not making these objections, especially since they should have realized that the defense would eventually phrase the questions properly to get the answers they wanted. Obviously, the prosecution is now desperate.