Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7
It sounds to me like the prosecution had to know that some or all? of the porn belonged to Neil but deliberatly ignored the fact so as to make DW look guilty.

If that is true which is obvious then it would stand to reason they have done the same thing in other areas of the case. Hmmmmmm

115 posted on 07/03/2002 10:01:54 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: winodog
Advocate Feldman is earning his "railroad brakeman" cap.
118 posted on 07/03/2002 10:03:32 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: winodog
The Prosecution certainly has "embellished" the evidence, haven't they?

DW is more embarrassed by his son's porno, than the Van Dams are/were about their deviant, amoral SWINGING sex life...go figure.

Judge Mudd should throw this case out, and go after the real perps..Start the investigation again.

140 posted on 07/03/2002 10:14:25 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson