To: luvbach1
If he does testify he will get the chair (actually a choice of lethal injection or the gas chamber). No way. The evidence is not sufficient to convict him if he fights it. Not in the jury's eyes.
To: AppyPappy
How do they refute the blood evidence and the handprint in the motor home? Not to mention the fiber evidence. Pointing out inconsequential procedural errors by the lab technicians doesn't negate the conclusions to me. I don't the jury will be persuaded to disregard them either. Much of the prosecution's case is circumstantial, that's true, but the physical evidence is also damning.This is not the OJ jury.I could be wrong; that's why they'll have to finish the trial.
88 posted on
07/02/2002 7:55:23 PM PDT by
luvbach1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson