Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
I've got another question....why did the prosecution not request that the two dark hairs (assuming DW's as not stated) be run thru the offender database?

Earlier today during the cross by Dusek of one of the witnesses (I forget which one) he asked if DW ever had a dog. When the witness said yes Dusek asked what the color, type and length of its hair was. The answer was short, black, and wavy. I thought to myself at the time that he was going to try to connect the dog's hair to the hairs found in DVD's fist and underarm.

305 posted on 07/02/2002 10:54:13 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: nycgal
The hair in her fist was identified as her own hair.
307 posted on 07/02/2002 10:55:37 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: nycgal
The hair in her fist was her own, wasn't it?....I would hope the prelimanary testing would have indicated human or animal....but then again??

Wonder if Dusek was just trying to rule out questions jurors had about the possibility of it being his dog hairs instead of Layla's?

319 posted on 07/02/2002 11:05:32 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson