To: luvbach1
The reason for this theory is that a cadaver dog gave a positive response to a outside storage binThis didn't happen..Feldman discredited 180Frank today..he never alerted any LEO to any alert...his dogs went thru the MH on 2/4 and 2/6....he only told of a possible alert on 2/22..after DW was arrested and news of the blood evidence was found.
If she were killed in the MH, why no urine or fecal matter found or blood from the rape?
How did he keep her quiet?..bound, drugged?
237 posted on
07/02/2002 9:47:41 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: Rheo
And why didn't the dogs indicate she had been INSIDE the MH?
I assume he didn't climb into the hatch to kill her...(/sarcasm)
To: Rheo
Glad you're here,cat slayer! Did we ever figure out about Keith Stone or Pete?
245 posted on
07/02/2002 9:53:19 PM PDT by
Jrabbit
To: Rheo
The dog handler did say he got an indication of a positive after DW's arrest (what you referred to as a possible alert) Feldman's efforts to muddy and nullify that didn't move me. For the purpose of my scenario which someone (you?) requested, I accepted that as a valid alert. One has to make some assumptions to formulate a scenario. Try to do it otherwise.I needn't remind you, this is not a court. We have alternative ways of approaching the truth in a discussion that is not allowed in court, but that does not mean they are necessarily invalid. As for physical evidence of the crimes, some was found. Just because all that you mentioned was not found only proves that the perp was successful in removing most of it. Keeping her quiet: bound, gagged, drugged. All of the above? Possibly.It was done by somebody.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson