[fatima]

:) I have been trying in the last 2 weeks to follow the trial and that's why I asked for the ping,I thought I missed the part of how he got in,what he did to her and how he got her out God bless her.It was never explained so they must be going on the other evidence that was shown.But I do wonder how it could be done and why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.

[spectre]

If the DA says they are going to tell us, and prove it...they better get on the ball...else their word is Mudd (sorry Judge)..:~)

sw

[UCANSEE2]

But I do wonder how it could be done and why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.

We all wonder how it could be done by an outsider,who was reportedly very drunk, while the MAN of the house was supposedly HOME, while the dog was there, and without leaving a shred of evidence of his having been there.

OTOH, there was plenty of evidence that other strangers had been in the house, but the police chose to ignore that evidence. There were prints, hairs, etc. from non family members that police did not attempt to identify.

[UCANSEE2]

why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.

My guess is because they didn't have any evidence on how he got in and out. Either they were hoping to have something before they got finished, or they flat out lied and hoped the jury would forget. (I would bet the latter).

[RnMomof7]

But I do wonder how it could be done and why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.

Alot of us have the same question...so the answer must be they can not prove it..