[luvbach1]

First, with all due respect to your opinion, the handprint was found in the motor home. I saw projections of it being compared with the post-mortem handprint of Danielle. So yes, she was alive, and she was in the motor home.I don't know exactly how he got her out of the house, but I know he did. So, speculating, I assume he walked out with Danielle wrapped in a blanket. It was risky, but it obviously happened.He possibly had parked another vehicle conveniently at the curb, avoiding the necessity of crossing the street, leaving it unlocked for ease of quick entry. He then drove to where his motor home was stored. Alternatively, he may have walked home and taken the child into his house. But this would have been extremely risky since police were on the scene before dawn.

[Rheo]

Just to be accurate..it was not a handprint...it was the print of the left ring and left middle finger....why do suppose they didn't print the entire horizontal cabinet over the bed?

[Karson]

But this would have been extremely risky since police were on the scene before dawn.

Sounds like you watch Court TV.

[Mrs.Liberty]

But this would have been extremely risky since police were on the scene before dawn.

In another time zone, maybe. Police were not called until close to 10 AM.

However, the perp could never be sure just when Danielle would be found missing and LE alerted.

[UCANSEE2]

THis sounds good, but explain how he got in and out of the house without leaving a trace of evidence.

Explain how he did this when he was drunk. How did he get a live Danielle out of her own house without her screaming?

[Jaded]

2 Fingerprints on the cabinet left ring and left middle. Partial palm print on the front driver's side window. Hair on bath mat. 1/4 in drop of blood on carpet in front of bathroom, 3/16 in on jacket. That is the overwhelming evidence.

Then what about the other hairs found? What about the other prints? Why did they not dust all of the RV for prints?