[BunnySlippers]

Ludicrous. There has, however, been a concerted effort to silence those of us who still have questions about the evidence, or lack of it.

No, those who think Westerfield is innocent have played upon the instructions to the jury. It doesn't apply here and I think it's important to point out.

I think LE has caught a child molester and I don't mind saying it.

[MizSterious]

Ludicrous again. Actually, I think the blood evidence is pretty strong, but I'd like to see something more substantial to support it. Thus, I am on the fence. But because I have questions, you would like to say I "support" him. I do not. I would just like to see all the evidence first. I am not yet ready to knit my little noose and head for the lynch party.

[nycgal]

No, those who think Westerfield is innocent have played upon the instructions to the jury.

If you took a poll right now of everyone who has participated on these threads, I will bet that very few, if any, of us believe that DW is innocent. We are waiting for both the prosecution and the defense to present all of their evidence to the jury.

On the other hand there are a number of people here who are totally certain of DW's guilt and have made it their mission to force the rest of us to agree with them, evidence or lack of it be d#mned.

[UCANSEE2]

. It doesn't apply here and I think it's important to point out. I think LE has caught a child molester and I don't mind saying it.

WHen did you get to be the JUDGE of what applies in a court of law?

Instruction to the jury are given by a JUDGE. Are you a JUDGE?

Once again, show us proof DW molested a child, any child.

[Jaded]

I think he's innocent.