Skip to comments.
A circuitous court
Washington Times ^
| 7/02/02
| Orrin G. Hatch
Posted on 07/01/2002 11:46:54 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:55:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision striking down the Pledge of Allegiance as unconstitutional because it contains the phrase "under God," is an outrageous example of judicial activism and overreaching. It also underscores the importance of our third branch of government
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
07/01/2002 11:46:54 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I would really like to see come out of Congress a bill forbidding the Federal courts to rule on matters of the establishment clause. I would also like to see this bill clarify the meaning of the First Amendment for the SCOTUS.
To: rwfromkansas
Have you emailed Schumer, McCain, Lahey and Daschle? Have you told them that they are derelict in their duties? Informed them that their role is to advise and let the full Senate give consent to the President's nominees. These clowns must hear from all of us. (And it wouldn't hurt if the President started lobbying for his own people!)
To: thegreatbeast
I am getting ready to post a thread in breaking news so Freepers get the idea of what we should do.....I heard these suggestions today on FR and they are dang good and need to get an airing at the top of the page.
To: thegreatbeast
I will send e-mails, btw. Bush did say the other day that this ruling is why the Senate needs to move on his nominees so that there will be judges that "understand our rights are derived from God."
He needs to use the bully pulpit..call a joint session of congress for crying out loud.
To: rwfromkansas
 |
I think recess appointments are going to happen
|
To: rwfromkansas
"I would really like to see come out of Congress a bill forbidding the Federal courts to rule on matters of the establishment clause"Well shoot why stop there. Why not push for a bill that prohibits the Federal courts from ruling on any matters concerning the Constitution?
7
posted on
07/02/2002 1:17:33 AM PDT
by
Kerberos
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson