Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
I think just as important as what trace was found...is what trace wasn't found.

DW's DNA was excluded as being under her fingernails...Danielle's was not in the scratches on his arm.

If she was kept in the MH, why only 1 print found?..he didn't wipe down as they found many unidentifable prints...nor did they even print that horizonatal cabinet over the bed..right next to where they did find a print??

Were all of Neil's friends dogs tested to see if any of them were matches for dog hair?

If he raped and killed her..why was no trace of her found in the shower drain?..did he not shower afterwards?

Why were no carpet fibers from DW's house found in the VD house?..or VD fibers found on his shoes?

And the list goes on.(correct me if I mis-stated)

76 posted on 07/02/2002 8:21:14 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Rheo
The only main evidence they seem to have is that spot of blood on DW's jacket. It seems it must have gotten on there at some other time because supposedly Danielle was smothered. Right?

83 posted on 07/02/2002 8:28:47 AM PDT by Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson