To: BunnySlippers; Valpal1; cyncooper
Hmm, how many charges are against Dw? 1,2..3?? Let the excuses and so called disclaimers fall where they may.Even feldman didn't deny the child porn..he just tried to blame the son... obsession.. LOL It's an obsession to a few cuz they want to ignore the charge apparently. The charges still stand, the jury didn't cry over cartoons, and whether DW went into the house or not...it's not a prerequisite to kidnapping.
To: Rheo; FresnoDA; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; Jaded; RnMomof7; spectre; FriarTom; DoughtyOne; bvw; mommya; ..
"whether DW went into the house or not...it's not a prerequisite to kidnapping"Here, I think, we have the...
IMMACULATE ABDUCTION THEORY!
Or maybe Scottie just beamed her out?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The charges are there for motive. Why are you so single-minded on this issue? A child was killed. Who did it is a big issue. What books and video tapes do you have in your home that someone could look at and point the finger at you for possessing? 99% of those pictures were adult women. This argument is so Monica-era (can't use that other word). I would think members of Free Republic would be able to see the bigger issues here. Guess not.
If he did it prove it. Dusek hasn't. That is the REAL issue.
"The opinion expressed by the above poster in no way endorses or condones child pornography, in any way, shape or form. Any member of this forum who assumes otherwise, does so at their own risk."
109 posted on
07/02/2002 8:50:34 AM PDT by
Jaded
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson