Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Prosecution Asks For One More Witness

Closed-Door Hearing Held Monday

Posted: 9:31 a.m. PDT July 1, 2002
Updated: 5:01 p.m. PDT July 1, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- Two experts on animal genetics testified Monday in a closed-door hearing to determine if the prosecution will be able to call one last witness in the David Westerfield trial before resting its case in chief.
Superior Court Judge William Mudd is scheduled to announce his decision on the final prosecution witness when the trial resumes Tuesday morning.

T.V.LIVE Trial Coverage Resumes 9 a.m. Tuesday
altOne of the witnesses seen entering the courtroom for the hearing outside the jury's presence was Oliver Ryder.

He is an adjunct professor of biology at UCSD and works for the Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species at the San Diego Zoo.

Ryder, who has published articles on mitochondrial DNA diversity in gorillas, also is the associate editor of the Journal of Heredity.

Dr. Joy Halverson, a canine DNA specialist with QuestGen Forensics in Davis, also testified.

A third man who took the stand declined to be identified.

Westerfield, 50, is charged with kidnapping, murder and misdemeanor possession of child pornography in the disappearance and killing of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam. The self-employed design engineer could get the death penalty if convicted of the felony charges.

Dogs have played crucial roles in the prosecution's case.

A volunteer handler testified last week that two search dogs "alerted" several times while sniffing in Westerfield's motor home four days after the victim was reported missing.

Jim Frazee, who helps the San Diego Sheriff's Department, said his dogs searched the 1997 Southwind motor home Feb. 6 at a vehicle storage facility on Aero Drive.alt

Also, police evidence technicians say hair consistent with Danielle van Dam's dog was found in the defendant's laundry.

Mudd has told defense attorney Steven Feldman to be ready to call his first witness Tuesday. Feldman has indicated he should be able to conclude his case by July 15.

Feldman told the judge he plans to call insect expert David Faulkner to the stand to try to pinpoint the time of Danielle's death.

In his opening statement, Feldman said the child's nude body could have been placed off a road in Dehesa as late as Feb. 16, a dozen days after his client came under 24-hour surveillance by law enforcement.

Prosecutors theorize that Westerfield, a twice-divorced father, killed the Sabre Springs second-grader and dumped her body at the East County site shortly after she disappeared Feb. 2. Volunteer searchers found the girl's decomposing body on Feb. 27.


1 posted on 07/01/2002 5:50:00 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious; spectre; Amore; Travis McGee; BunnySlippers; DoughtyOne; Hillary's Lovely Legs; ...
Ping....Couneter Terrorism Thread...) ) ) LOL
2 posted on 07/01/2002 5:50:48 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
Anything to put Westerfield INSIDE the house? Ever?

Not closely focused on the case, that would be a real *critical* bit that I'm not aware the prosecution has been able to address. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

3 posted on 07/01/2002 5:53:58 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
Beautiful photo of a Weimaraner, but is there a reason for it? Were the search dogs run by Jim Frazee weims?

Defendant David Westerfield sits in court as
witnesses testified about hair and carpet fiber
evidence, during proceedings June 24, 2002
at the San Diego courthouse. Westerfield is
accused of the kidnapping and murder of
seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her
Sabre Springs home, last February.

Photo by Pool/Reuters - Jun 24 8:38 PM ET

5 posted on 07/01/2002 6:06:08 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
Poor Layla, the poor worthless watch dog, who doesn't bark and tears up her bed just isn't getting any attention or respect..:~( sw
6 posted on 07/01/2002 6:16:28 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA; All
Maybe you should try again, start a new thread where we can discuss the Trial today, SPAM free. Talk about beating a dead horse...this is so sophmoric...sigh. It's really a major problem.

sw

22 posted on 07/02/2002 5:28:15 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
I know I missed it somewhere, but what about Barb's testimony? Wasn't she supposed to be a witness for the prosecution? The woman who went to Dad's w/BvD & the other girlfriend.
50 posted on 07/02/2002 7:42:14 AM PDT by bird humming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
Why is anyone interested in this case, much less obsessed with it? Ditto the Utah case. who gives a frog's fat ass? The people interested in these cases are the same people who obsessed over OJ. It's ruining Fox News, which now dedicates about 10 hours a day to the Utah case, regardless of whether there are any developments or not.

Turn off the TV and the computer.
164 posted on 07/02/2002 9:40:46 AM PDT by ACross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
My question is... what was he doing with the DOG there too?!
858 posted on 07/02/2002 4:34:27 PM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson