Skip to comments.
Trial of David Westerfield: Experts Testify At Closed-door Sessions: (DEFENSE BEGINS!! 7-02-2002)
Union Trib ^
| July 2, 2002
| Union Trib
Posted on 07/01/2002 5:50:00 PM PDT by FresnoDA
SIGNONSANDIEGO July 1, 2002
Two experts on animal genetics testified today in a closed-door hearing to determine if the prosecution will be able to call one last witness in the David Westerfield trial before resting its case. One of the witnesses seen entering the courtroom for the hearing outside the jury's presence was Oliver Ryder.
Ryder is an adjunct professor of biology at UCSD and works for the Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species at the San Diego Zoo.
Joy Halverson, a canine DNA specialist with QuestGen Forensics in Davis, also testified.
A third man who took the stand declined to be identified.
Westerfield, 50, is charged with kidnapping, murder and misdemeanor possession of child pornography in the disappearance and killing of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam. The self-employed design engineer could get the death penalty if convicted of the felony charges.
Dogs have played crucial roles in the prosecution's case.
A volunteer handler testified last week that two search dogs alerted several times while sniffing in Westerfield's motorhome four days after the victim was reported missing.
Also, police evidence technicians say hair consistent with Danielle van Dam's dog was found in the defendant's laundry.
Superior Court Judge William Mudd is scheduled to announce his decision on the final prosecution witness when the trial resumes tomorrow morning. Mudd has told defense attorney Steven Feldman to be ready to call his first witness tomorrow. Feldman has indicated he should be able to conclude his case by July 15.
Feldman told the judge he plans to call insect expert David Faulkner to the stand to try to pinpoint the time of Danielle's death.
In his opening statement, Feldman said the child's nude body could have been placed off a road in Dehesa as late as Feb. 16, a dozen days after his client came under 24-hour surveillance by law enforcement.
Prosecutors theorize that Westerfield killed the Sabre Springs second-grader and dumped her body at the East County site shortly after she disappeared Feb. 2. Volunteer searchers found the girl's decomposing body off Dehasa Road on Feb. 27.
Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 981-989 next last
To: All
Why did the cookie sale from a year ago, when she supposedly saw the plastic hanging from the kitchen due to the remodel, all of sudden just go away?
She wanted to see the results of the remodel when she went to his house that week.....so we don't just have Danielle in the house that cookie day but also from a year ago....how many other times and was the MH there then?
81
posted on
07/02/2002 8:27:08 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: MizSterious
Oh well, "you can lead a horse to water"....:~)
sw
82
posted on
07/02/2002 8:28:38 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Rheo
The only main evidence they seem to have is that spot of blood on DW's jacket. It seems it must have gotten on there at some other time because supposedly Danielle was smothered. Right?
83
posted on
07/02/2002 8:28:47 AM PDT
by
Lucky
To: Space Wrangler
It's possible some of SD LE was assisting the van Dams. Certainly one Diane Halfman was: recently retired from the force, she was mentioned in a few newspaper articles helping the vDs deal with the police. Along with the high-dollar PR firm and the civil suit attorney...
So much that is 'wrong with this picture' but some don't see it. Can't figure it out for the life of me.
To: John Jamieson
Mornin JJ! "
The logic that some people are using is this:"
Who, the prosecutor? That's not what I'm seeing. I see people went from evidence to a possible conclusion...
To: nycgal
I just found it odd that no mention of even trying to print it....probably right tho about not enough of it to print.
Don't recall that any of DW's DNA or trace was found in it....no goatee hair, saliva, etc.
86
posted on
07/02/2002 8:30:37 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Space Wrangler
That would be Brenda & Co. Denise said he was creepy this from someone who is ditzy. The information to get the warrant was embellished based on information Brenda and Damon so conveniently gave. The again, Detective Parga was concerned about the grass yellowing in the dead of winter because of the hose. How sweet.
87
posted on
07/02/2002 8:30:50 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Jaded
LOL I'm cracking up cuz according to a minority, we can only discuss swinging,and the vd's but not the other charges...sad sad sad..
To: Rheo
Rheo, not to mention arm hair--if he was holding her down, wouldn't some of his arm hair have gotten caught in the necklace? Certainly fibers did--why not arm hair? Had he shaved his arms? No, wait, we have pictures of the scratches. Those are very hairy arms.
See, I just have a real hard time with the prosecution's lack of solid evidence. A real hard time.
To: Rheo
IMO, it is very telling that DW had two live-in girlfriends with daughters. Neither have come forward to accuse DW of ANY untoward behaviour with the children.
IF he had an interest in children, why not take advantage of those most easily accessible? Why break into someone's house, which you've never been in, to satisfy that urge. Why not just grab a kid from a playground?
90
posted on
07/02/2002 8:33:22 AM PDT
by
demsux
To: Lucky
Suffication was the one thing he couldn't rule out.
Then the theory started that her teeth were knocked out causing the blood....even tho the expert dentist said it was common to see teeth missing in that state of decomposition.
91
posted on
07/02/2002 8:33:27 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Jaded
Jaded, I guess that warrant was sealed. Any way to find out
what it said exactly? Or what dvd and bvd told police that
siccked them on to westerdude?
92
posted on
07/02/2002 8:34:18 AM PDT
by
HoneyBoo
To: MizSterious
Why would a PR firm suggest to a grieving mother that she have her nails done within 2 weeks of her daughters disappearance?..that sounds like bad advice.(pics of her at the arraignment show nicely done acrylic nails)
93
posted on
07/02/2002 8:35:16 AM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Space Wrangler
She stated under oath that she wanted to see his knobs. Whatever. I don't think a 6' 2", 210lb drunk man could sneak in to an occupied home and abduct a child. Dont' much think a man in that condition could sneak up on a corpse. If Stealth Ninja Dave could do that, the should be working for the CIA.
94
posted on
07/02/2002 8:35:33 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Space Wrangler
The speculation is that through their very good friend, former LE Diane Halfman, a directive was given to look at David and only David. They disregarded any evidence that pointed away from him. It's in the trial testimony.
95
posted on
07/02/2002 8:37:36 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: demsux
What would be a real shocker, would be to find out that one of the live-in children at DW's house, actually TOOK Danielle into his MH for a little "open house" tour...
It's a possibility.
sw
96
posted on
07/02/2002 8:37:43 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: Jaded
Thanks for the clarification. I wonder exactly what Brenda and/or Damon told police to get them on DW's trail?
To: Rheo
Pics of her just days after the arraignment show perfectly styled hair and manicured nails also. Brenda's to-do list: First the hair and nails, then practice on appearing "grieving"....
To: HoneyBoo
Honeyboo, I don't have the link handy, but go to www.signonsandiego and click on the Westerfield trial section. The available documents are there in mostly pdf format, although the trial and ph transcripts are text files.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Actually, we are trying to discuss the
other evidence and sworn testimony where there are gaping holes. One cannot sentence a man to death on porn alone. The porn charge is a MISDEMEANOR in California. The other evidence leads to more questions for which Dusek cannot or will not give answers. His all-star witnesses have been sorely lacking.
"The opinion expressed by the above poster in no way endorses or condones child pornography, in any way, shape or form. Any member of this forum who assumes otherwise, does so at their own risk."
100
posted on
07/02/2002 8:42:23 AM PDT
by
Jaded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 981-989 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson