Posted on 07/01/2002 11:53:55 AM PDT by TC Rider
EPA Says Cleanups May Be Cut Back
WASHINGTON (AP) - Cleanup work at toxic waste sites in 18 states will be severely curtailed or in some cases halted under a Bush administration plan to reduce spending for the nation's Superfund program, according to an Environmental Protection Agency ( news - web sites) analysis.
EPA Administrator Christie Whitman previously announced planned cutbacks, but an EPA inspector general's report, made public Monday, for the first time indicated which sites would be affected.
The IG report, released by two Democratic congressmen, said 33 Superfund sites in 18 states would no longer get money, beginning next fiscal year, from a special cleanup fund that is running out of money.
A dozen other sites across the country will get some additional money, but less than what regional officials had said is needed for cleanup. And long-term remediation work at more than 50 additional sites also would receive less money, the report said.
The Bush administration wants to shift funding for the 33 cleanup projects to the government's general fund, meaning taxpayers would pay. But such a shift requires congressional approval and will slow down the work and likely halt it entirely is some cases.
The Superfund projects singled out for cutbacks are among the country's most polluted sites. They include several old mines in Montana, a wood preservative plant in Louisiana, chemical plants in Florida and a New Jersey plant that once made the herbicide Agent Orange, the IG report said.
The 1980 Superfund law says polluters should pay to clean up their own environmental mess. The fund came from taxes on chemical and petroleum companies, but those taxes expired in 1995 and Congress has not renewed them.
Since 1995, the fund has dwindled from a high of $3.6 billion to a projected $28 million at the end of next year. The Bush administration has opposed resumption of the special taxes and Congress has not addressed the issue recently.
Two Democratic congressmen — Rep. John Dingell ( news, bio, voting record) of Michigan and Frank Pallone of New Jersey — asked for the EPA report and made it public Monday. Details were first reported Monday by The New York Times.
Dingell said the administration's refusal to support renewal of the Superfund tax has "seriously imperiled" the cleanup "of the most dangerous contaminated toxic waste sites in the country" because of inadequate funding.
"The Bush Administration refuses to fund the necessary cleanup of toxic sites around the nation," added Pallone. He said failure to restore the Superfund tax "seriously undermines" the program.
Whitman has opposed the tax, saying it requires companies to pay even if they did not pollute. "It's on everyone in an industry, so that even those that have the best of environmental records are also paying," she told a congressional hearing earlier this year.
The projects that were cut off from the fund, beginning next fiscal year, include five sites in Florida, five in New Jersey, three in Texas, and two each in Nebraska, Montana, Louisiana and Oklahoma. The other states, each with one site, are Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia. There also is one in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The EPA's regional offices have requested $450 million for remedial actions at 77 sites that sought additional funding, but only $224 million was allocated, the IG report said. In addition to the 33 sites that got no money from the fund, another 12 sites received less than what was requested.
Also, requests for long-term remediation at 54 sites got $33.2 million, about 70 percent of what had been requested, the IG reported.
Regional EPA officials said the cuts in many cases would slow long-term cleanup or prevent some activities from being started, the IG said:
_Officials in EPA's Kansas City office said one $100 million project would have to be extended from five years to 10 years.
_The Denver office said work at two sites will not begin because it will not receive $10 million the region requested.
_The Atlanta office said the cuts created "a bottleneck in the Superfund pipeline" and a $6 million shortfall at several sites in the Southeast region would slow cleanup.
I'm so sick of these people. The Superfund was just another way to funnel money to the lawyers, who sued to get innocent corporations to clean up other peoples messes.
Doesn't any of these airheads at Associated Press understand that it's up to the House, not Bush to levy taxes?
The Bush administration wants to shift funding for the 33 cleanup projects to the government's general fund, meaning taxpayers would pay.
Who does the author think is paying now? If charged against petro and chem companies, they just raise the price of goods, creating an invisible tax.
huh?
Bump!
"What about Dingel-Norwood?"
This is illustrative of the mans exceptional POLITICAL acumen.
This, along with the ABM withdrawl, the Denouncing of Arafat, among other things, has to be seen in LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THE LEFT WING PRESS cannot lay a glove on him, as he destroys leftist shiboleth after leftist shibboleth....This story will die a quiet death, and some A*hole like edwards will try to tie it to arsenic in his campaign, but in the end it will go NOWHERE......Pretty Good for a Republican President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.