Skip to comments.
CPI Exclusive: Daughter, Mother: Leave God in the Pledge
Conservative Press International ^
| July 1, 2002
| Peter Forman
Posted on 07/01/2002 9:17:49 AM PDT by CPI News
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said on Wednesday, June 26 that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional. The court ruled that the words "under God" is a particular endorsement of religion that violates the Constitution's Establishment Clause requiring a separation between church and state.
An atheist, Michael A. Newdow of California, whose daughter attended a local elementary school, filed the lawsuit. The suit claims that the Pledge of Allegiance being recited by a teacher harms her rights.
However, breaking revelations surrounding the case have led people to question the legitimacy of the suit. Based on information obtained by CPI News, a startling new fact has been unearthed regarding the personal opinions of Michael Newdow's daughter and her mother.
According to information, the man who filed the legal suit in June did so against the wishes of his daughter and her mother, both of which identify themselves as Christians and attend a Calvary Chapel.
By identifying themselves as Christians, the daughter presumably didn't become uncomfortable when reciting or objected to the Pledge of Allegiance - an action that directly contradicts the essence of the lawsuit.
However, Dr. Michael Newdow, who is an emergency room doctor with a law degree, said that the pledge harmed his daughter's First Amendment rights because she had to "watch and listen as her state-employed teacher in her state-run school leads her classmates in a ritual proclaiming that there is a God, and that ours is `one nation under God.'"
www.cpinews.net/archives/2002-q3/pledge.ruling.daughter/
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: allegiance; california; court; daughter; god; mother; newdow; pledge; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
1
posted on
07/01/2002 9:17:49 AM PDT
by
CPI News
To: CPI News
Priceless.
2
posted on
07/01/2002 9:21:03 AM PDT
by
smith288
To: CPI News
Does atheist daddy have custody? Newdow sure gives this impression!
3
posted on
07/01/2002 9:21:14 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: CPI News
You mean he lied? I find it hard to believe a liberal would use that tactic to get what he wants. < /sarcasm>
To: CPI News
In the interview I heard, the father admitted this was more about him than the daughter, who voluntarily recited the pledge.
To: CPI News
If true, this is fascinating.
6
posted on
07/01/2002 9:23:41 AM PDT
by
Fzob
To: Recovering_Democrat; LonePalm; Argh; xsmommy; hobbes1; christine11; RikaStrom; Slip18; ...
.. the plot thickens ..
7
posted on
07/01/2002 9:23:57 AM PDT
by
TxBec
To: CPI News
bump
8
posted on
07/01/2002 9:23:57 AM PDT
by
scan58
To: CPI News
Another reason the 9th should be dismantled.
9
posted on
07/01/2002 9:24:34 AM PDT
by
smith288
To: CPI News
According to information, the man who filed the legal suit in June did so against the wishes of his daughter and her mother, both of which identify themselves as Christians and attend a Calvary Chapel. Shades of Roe v Wade.
10
posted on
07/01/2002 9:24:39 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: TxBec
i just saw this, i want that weasel-butted guy thrown out of court.
11
posted on
07/01/2002 9:24:59 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: xsmommy
:: handing you my boxing gloves ::
12
posted on
07/01/2002 9:25:46 AM PDT
by
TxBec
To: CPI News
This also sounds like a get-back-at-the-ex tactic as well.
He's an emergency room doctor, huh? I'd like to see him try to stop a victim's family praying for their loved one.
This just goes to show how stupid the Ninth Circuit looks. The lawsuit was brought up on fraudulent evidence. Even if it hadn't been fraudulent, it was a stupid decision. Can he be charged with anything?
To: Fzob
If true, then Newdow perpetrated a fraud on the court. And after getting slammed by the Dems AND the Pubbies, the judge will be looking to roll some--er, uh, stuff, yeah, that's it, STUFF--downhill, and Newdow is at the bottom of the hill.
Whoopsie.
14
posted on
07/01/2002 9:26:16 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: illstillbe; Chairman_December_19th_Society; Howlin
Ha! I was right! He WAS harassing the mother with this lawsuit!!
To: CPI News
of his daughter and her mother, both of which identify themselves as Christians and attend a Calvary Chapel. Mr. Newdow wouldn't have been caught objectifying women in this way .... ;-)
(He'd rather objectify his daughter as an atheist stalking horse, but that's a different matter.)
16
posted on
07/01/2002 9:27:05 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: CPI News
An atheist, coward and a liar....aren't they one in the same really?
17
posted on
07/01/2002 9:27:25 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
To: CPI News
The wires reported today that this is part of a domestic dispute. Newdow lost custody of his daughter in a divorce and got his law degree to fight the "family court system." Sounds like the court made the right call to me on custody. This guy is a real piece of work.
To: CPI News
Athiest's.....God only knows what they will try next!
To: colorado tanker
This guy sounds like he's going to be the subject of a "Bailiff, slap his pee-pee!" order...
20
posted on
07/01/2002 9:29:59 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson