Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Korea: Rules Of Engagement Face Overhaul
Korea Times | July 1, 2002 | Sohn Suk-joo

Posted on 07/01/2002 7:32:48 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

North Korea's sinking of a South Korean warship near the sea border in the West Sea has raised questions about the rules of engagement set and enforced by the United Nations Command (UNC).

When South Korea's warships are dispatched to repel invading North Korean vessels, they should first broadcast warnings with loudspeakers and fire warning shots before opening fire, according to the rules.

But the South's warships have to take the risk of coming within at least 900 meters of the North Korean ships to broadcast warnings. From that distance, warships come within a 90 percent chance of being an easy target of gunfire.

The engagement rules, albeit highly risky, are designed to prevent an escalation of a limited clash into all-out war on the Korean peninsula. Given the erratic nature of North Korean military, however, there is the possibility that the Navy will always fall victim to a preemptive attack, analysts say.

To rectify the situation, Defense Minister Kim Dong-shin told the National Assembly that his ministry would make an overhaul of the rules of engagement along with the UNC to prepare for provocative acts by North Korea near the sea or land border.

In an emergency meeting of the National Defense Committee, he said, ``Our side followed the rules of engagement, but the North Korean warships made a calculated surprise attack.''

Presidential Secretary for Foreign Affairs Yim Sung-joon, who is currently in Japan with President Kim Dae-jung, backed Minister Kim, saying, ``If necessary, the rules of engagement should be changed to prevent the recurrence of a similar incidents.''

At Kim's instruction, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) is studying ways of issuing a warning to approaching North Korean vessels at a safe distance without depending upon the use of loudspeakers.

``It will take some time to revise the rules of engagement because we have to first consult with the UNC,'' a JCS official said.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/01/2002 7:32:48 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
You send larger ships than the ones you face and you have fighters overhead with Harpoons on ready.
2 posted on 07/01/2002 7:35:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The reports I read and heard said that a South Korean frigate had faced off against two North Korean gunboats ... and the frigate lost?

What kind of ships are they building over there. A frigate should have been able to have held its own against two gunboats.

3 posted on 07/01/2002 7:38:09 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
It should unless the frigate is sitting there as a target.
4 posted on 07/01/2002 7:39:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
If the US and China just standby and let Koreans fight the war themselve, the North will definitely have a landslide victory.
5 posted on 07/01/2002 10:04:00 AM PDT by Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lake
Doubtful.

The South Korean economy, along with Seoul, would be wrecked, but North Korea doesn't have a chance of doing anything other than destroying a lot of property and lives before it runs out of fuel, food, and vintage Soviet arms.

After that, Korean family reunifications would increase exponentially.

6 posted on 07/01/2002 3:58:18 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; BlueLancer
S. Korean frigate had exocets and harpoons, and was 8km away from NK gun boats. In addition, there were 2 KF-16's(local version of American F-16) and F-4's, one minute flight from the target area. So they had enough to blow those NK boats out of water. But S. Korean military brass got cold feet because they fear this could create escalation, violating the dictum from their leader Kim Dae-Jung.

N. Korea does have many fast gun and missile boats, extensive shore artilleries, silk-worm anti-ship missiles from the shore(covers area up to outer port area of Inchon) and SA5 surface-to-air missiles batteries which are said to have 250km range. These information is all from local papers. But they should have sunk those boats south of NLL. Fear of escalation go both ways. N. Korea always count on the belief that we will blink all the time.

We should draw up the potential engagement plan in case this kind of incident occur again. This should include decimating all shore installations with boats, missiles, and dug-in artilleries. S. Korea alone have enough air/naval-assets to do this. We have to give them fair warning that the repeat of this incident will result in the total distruction of all naval assets in Hwang-Hae-Do shore area.

Finally, we should not make this derail talks on their WMD and their proliferation. This must be the main aim of this attack. To distract us from talking the important matters, and make this provocation a main theme. We should do both. Draw up extensive and decisive response to the repeat of this incident and pound them about their WMDs.

7 posted on 07/02/2002 12:49:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
Re #6

NK can create a lot of property damage, as you said ,using missiles and fortified artilleries. But I doubt that they can get into Seoul w/o using WMD's. Theses days Seoul is ringed with crowded commuter towns in all directions, along all roads, large or small. Any incoming large army from North has to travel through this maze. Many buildings here are high-rise apartments. Defenders can take their places in these buildings and mow down invaders with machine guns and anti-tank missiles. Even if NK managed to airlift some troops to the south of Seoul and move up to Seoul, the problem remains. The southern area also have crowded towns, Bundang,Sung-Nam,Suwon,Yong-In, all buidings serving as maze of fortified bunkers with great view on the roads. It will be the grave to invading army.

8 posted on 07/02/2002 12:57:14 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Guess it all depends on how bad the North Koreans wanted Seoul - they've got the troops to force the issue, methinks, but would 6th Army (exhaust) themselves in the process.
9 posted on 07/02/2002 5:54:55 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson