Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Agrees to Extend Bosnia Mission
AP via Yahoo! ^ | Sun Jun 30, 7:26 PM ET | EDITH M. LEDERER

Posted on 06/30/2002 4:41:32 PM PDT by jae471

U.S. Agrees to Extend Bosnia Mission
Sun Jun 30, 7:26 PM ET

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States agreed Sunday to keep the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Bosnia going for three more days, shortly after vetoing a six-month extension because American peacekeepers did not get immunity from the new International Criminal Court.

Photos

AP Photo
U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte joined in the unanimous vote approving the brief extension to work out the dispute, after earlier going against almost all 14 other members of the powerful council. The 1,500-strong U.N. police training mission in Bosnia had been due to end at midnight Sunday.

The U.S. brinkmanship was clearly aimed at underscoring the Bush administration's opposition to the International Criminal Court, which comes into existence on Monday. It also underlined Washington's willingness to stand against virtually all other council members, including close allies, and to end all U.N. peacekeeping missions if necessary - not just the Bosnian missions.

Negroponte said he hoped the veto and the brief delay would highlight the importance of the issue to the United States, and he stressed that it wasn't a question of just the Bosnian mission: "It's a question of peacekeeping in general."

The council members - including Britain and France - support the new court and argue that a U.S. exemption would undermine the tribunal and international law.

The United States is demanding that American and other peacekeepers from countries that have not ratified the treaty establishing the court be exempt from arrest and prosecution by the tribunal. It has rejected all compromises that don't grant blanket immunity.

The United States says immunity is needed to prevent American troops and citizens from frivolous and political motivated prosecutions. Opponents say there are enough safeguards to prevent such abuse.

In the first vote Sunday, 13 countries favored extending the mandate for Bosnia's U.N. police training mission for six months and authorization for the NATO ( news - web sites)-led force for a year. Bulgaria, a sponsor of the resolution, abstained to highlight the absence of council unity but said it still supports the court.

NATO said its 18,000-strong NATO-led peacekeeping mission in Bosnia would not be jeopardized by a U.S. veto because its mandate comes from the 1995 Dayton peace agreement that ended the 3-year war in the Balkan nation. The NATO force, however, includes 3,100 Americans.

Negroponte said the United States voted against the resolution "with great reluctance" but will not ask Americans in U.N. peacekeeping missions "to accept the additional risk of political prosecution before a court whose jurisdiction the government of the United States does not accept.

"The United States will remain a special target," he said, "and we cannot have our decisions second-guessed."

Immediately after the resolution was defeated, council members returned to closed-door consultations to work on the resolution that would briefly extend the Bosnian mandate. France and Britain proposed an extension until July 15, but the United States would only agree to 72 hours.

Supporters of the court expressed dismay at the U.S. veto, which could affect the 14 other U.N. peacekeeping missions - from Cyprus to East Timor ( news - web sites) - as their mandates come up for renewal in the Security Council.

"History, I believe, will record the actions of the U.S. administration of President George W. Bush ( news - web sites) to wreck U.N. peacekeeping and the International Criminal Court as one of the most shameful lows in global U.S. leadership," said William Pace, head of the International Coalition for a Criminal Court, a coalition of more than 1,000 organizations supporting the tribunal.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan ( news - web sites) urged the council to intensify high-level negotiations.

"The world cannot afford a situation in which the Security Council is deeply divided on such an important issue, which may have implications for all U.N. peace operations," he said.

This was supposed to be the last six-month extension for the U.N. mission in Bosnia, which has been helping to develop a multiethnic and professional police force. The training operation is being handed over to the European Union ( news - web sites) on Jan. 1.

Annan said it would be "most unfortunate" if the premature termination of the Bosnia mission set back international efforts to help the country achieve lasting peace "after the country was ripped apart by war from 1992 to 1995."

The veto won't stop the world's first permanent war crimes court from coming into existence Monday. Dutch administrators overseeing its initial months of operation are ready to register claims of genocide and wartime atrocities committed after Monday.

With the backing of 74 countries - despite fierce opposition from the United States - The Hague ( news - web sites)-based institute will have the authority to prosecute individuals - not states - suspected of war crimes anywhere in the world.

"All who believe in democracy and justice and the rule of law can celebrate," Pace said. "This is truly one of the greatest advances of international law since the founding of the United Nations ( news - web sites) 57 years ago."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bosnia; unlist; worldcourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
UNITED NATIONS - United States vetoes resolution to extend U.N. peacekeeping mission in Bosnia
1 posted on 06/30/2002 4:41:32 PM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; Dog; Timesink; kattracks; ATOMIC_PUNK; demlosers; TomGuy; AntiDemocrat
Check this out....

2 posted on 06/30/2002 4:44:08 PM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471
I'm sorry that we extending this thing for even 72 hours. I want to see all our guys on every peacekeeping mission immediately removed to ships offshore. We can operate logistical support, but we shouldn't even consider anything that could result in a phony claim against us. Since the ICC mandate is starting on July 1, every single American involved in any peacekeeping mission should be back on base prepared to ship out.
3 posted on 06/30/2002 4:49:10 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
3 days to pack the bags.
4 posted on 06/30/2002 4:50:20 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Maybe the U.N. blinked.
5 posted on 06/30/2002 4:52:08 PM PDT by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Too bad.

How I wish we'd stick to our guns, for once!

6 posted on 06/30/2002 4:53:14 PM PDT by katya8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jae471
The United States agreed Sunday to keep the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Bosnia going for three more days, shortly after vetoing a six-month extension because American peacekeepers did not get immunity from the new International Criminal Court.

U.S. troops should be defending the U.S. not acting as 'peacekeepers' across the globe. We require no immunity from the ICC if we mind our own business, avoid entangling alliances and maintain our strength. The ICC is a disgrace that we should never have backed in any way. Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S.

7 posted on 06/30/2002 4:53:23 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katya8
I think we still are.....we are just extending it 3 more days to see if they will back down and agree with us. After that, our veto would stand.
8 posted on 06/30/2002 4:57:56 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jae471
Are our servicemen vulnerable to the ICC for the duration of this 3-day extension? Can't believe the poor reporting!
9 posted on 06/30/2002 5:03:03 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471
But...but...Bill promised us it would only be for a year and HE wouldn't lie to us, would he? After all, he was the President of the United States...and he kept telling us he felt our pain!
10 posted on 06/30/2002 5:06:43 PM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471
To hell with this mission.

Our troops are needed at home, on our borders, and in the field, fighting Al-Queda.

And the ones who have been stuck in Bosnia these many years deserve a little R&R before redeployment.

11 posted on 06/30/2002 5:08:56 PM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471
"History, I believe, will record the actions of the U.S. administration of President George W. Bush ( news - web sites) to wreck U.N. peacekeeping and the International Criminal Court

I can live with that. If this is the case it could likely be his greatest accomplishment as POTUS and not a bad one at that. I hope he sticks to this and does not allow our nation to come under a world court.

12 posted on 06/30/2002 5:09:11 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471
On whose side does Clinton think he is on?
13 posted on 06/30/2002 5:14:55 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Get the U.S. out of the U.N. Get the U.N. out of the U.S. Get our soldiers home and out of U.N. peacekeeping missions. The U.S. needs to stop giving money to the U.N. and American citizens should stop travelling abroad to the countries that signed on with the ICC.
14 posted on 06/30/2002 5:29:10 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
Yep, what you said.
15 posted on 06/30/2002 5:34:29 PM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jae471
"The council members - including Britain and France - support the new court and argue that a U.S. exemption would undermine the tribunal and international law."

It's time for the EU to pay for its own military and peace keeping forces.

The US has said "no" to this ICC. The rest of the world is going to have to carry out this farce by themselves.

16 posted on 06/30/2002 5:36:06 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jae471

17 posted on 06/30/2002 5:41:18 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp

18 posted on 06/30/2002 5:44:32 PM PDT by WakeUpChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jae471
It also underlined Washington's willingness to stand against virtually all other council members, including close allies, and to end all U.N. peacekeeping missions if necessary - not just the Bosnian missions.

Getting the U.S. out of alleged U.N. peacekeping missions would be a step forward for world peace. See Global Peace by the Global Police

19 posted on 06/30/2002 5:51:55 PM PDT by StopGlobalWhining
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The thing that worries me is the 27% funding we currently are furnishing. These scum bags will agree to anything for that kind of money. So, don't get your hopes up too high because for that kind of funding cut the UN will agree with the US. I just hope GWB stands tough and does not accept a phoney deal with loop holes, that can come back another day to haunt us.

Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.

This would guarantee GW's reelection in 04.

20 posted on 06/30/2002 6:19:56 PM PDT by rstevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson