You sound kind of like a racist. Just because some POWs were mistreated by some Asian soldiers doesn't mean it was ASIANS as a whole who did things wrong. Also just because Jews were slaughtered by evil SS guards doesn't mean the German people is an evil people. Just because some GIs killed innocent people in My Lai, Vietman doesn't mean the American people is a blood-thirsty people.
Now you're beginning to sound like AJArmitage. Your original statement was that groups of young men would cajole a "peasant's" dog into having intercourse with a female, then slice off it's penis, allowing it to bleed to death.
You then went on to say that these people were really "tender hearted", more so than "westerners". That is a bit of a racist comment itself I'd say, in addition to being ridiculously flawed.
I simply pointed out the fact that POWs would not agree with your characterization of such "tenderness". The torture and mistreatment of US prisoners at the hand of the Japanese in WWII, the North Koreans during the Korean conflict (and the Pueblo incident), and the Vietnamese during the Vietnam war are without question the most horrendous abuses ever seen. The medical experiments performed on captured soldiers make those performed by the Nazis seem tame in comparison.
So get off your "racist" high horse and smell the coffee. It is the callous indifference to life that allows such atrocities to take place. There are MANY Asians who detest such abuses, but there are also MANY that see nothing wrong with it. That is a plain simple fact.
Atrocities have been committed by people of all races, but an enlightened society refrains from such tactics. As proven by much of the material I've linked and posted, there are quite a few people in South Korea that detest the manner in which dogs and cats are treated, and I salute them for their courage and tenacity.