Friend and Confident priest abused Boys for 20 years (New Zealand)

When Father Alan Woodcock left after just a year at St Patrick's College, Silverstream, the school yearbook ran a glowing tribute.

"Father Woodcock's stay at Silverstream has proved all too short," it said. "He quickly established himself as a friend and confidant to those boys with an interest in music and others who came to recognise and appreciate his availability and sympathetic approach."

In fact, Woodcock was moved on from the Upper Hutt school after allegations of abuse by three boys.

It was the second time complaints had been made against him, but it was far from the last.

Cases like his have prompted NZ's bishops to make an unprecedented statement to the country's 480,000 Catholics. At Masses today and tomorrow, parishioners will hear a pastoral letter signed by all the bishops apologising to any victims of sexual abuse within the church.

During his 20 years as a Marist priest, Woodcock molested at least eight boys or young men. At least three times, senior figures in his order, the Society of Mary, were made aware of the allegations.

The order now admits it made serious mistakes in the way it dealt with Woodcock. It also says the police should have been called in.

"Certainly now we would immediately remove him from ministry, we would send him for assessment and treatment and he would never again return to ministry," the order's deputy leader, Father Tim Duckworth, said this week.

In the 10 years since Woodcock left the Marist priests, fresh complaints have been made against him and the order has set up an 0800 number for others who want to come forward.

He was a serial offender whose behaviour should have rung alarm bells. With the benefit of hindsight, the order admits that.

Woodcock was ordained a Marist priest in 1972. Between then and 1979, he worked at a variety of places, including Christchurch and a school in Hawkes Bay.

In 1979, Woodcock was convicted of a sex offence involving a man in Christchurch and received a suspended sentence.

"That was the first time we were aware he had those [tendencies]," said Father Duckworth.

Woodcock was moved to Wellington and sent to a psychologist. While receiving treatment, he went to Victoria University to study music.

With his music qualifications, Woodcock was sent to St Patrick's in 1982 - despite his conviction.

Father Duckworth said the psychologist had told the order there was every likelihood Woodcock could be rehabilitated.

During the year he was there, three sixth-form boys alleged Woodcock had fondled them. The principal, Father Vincent Curtain, asked the Marists' chief at the time, Father Fred Bliss, to remove Woodcock.

But Father Bliss decided to leave Woodcock at the school until the end of the year.

For the rest of his time at St Patrick's, Woodcock was put under closer scrutiny. He was subject to rules such as not having boys in his room with the door closed.

Before the rules were imposed, though, Woodcock had dealings with another boy, a 15-year-old sent to him for counselling.

The boy went to the police in the 1990s alleging abuse that went on even after Woodcock left the school. Police decided not to move against Woodcock at the time, but it is understood they may now extradite him.

After St Patrick's, Woodcock was sent to the Marist novitiate, a centre near Palmerston North, for training candidates for the priesthood.

One man who knew Woodcock said this week: "I don't know what they were thinking, sending him there - most of the guys who were training had come straight out of school."

In 1984, Woodcock was moved to the Marists' Fotuna retreat centre in Wellington. The following year, he returned to the novitiate.

It was during these years that another young man received unwanted attention from Woodcock. His allegations would not surface until the 1990s.

Woodcock was sent in 1986 to Australia to a hospital-based treatment programme for clergy struggling with their sexuality.

There, he was visited by a former pupil who would later allege that Woodcock groped him. The young man is one of five victims of abuse who have shared $110,000 in payouts from the order.

Woodcock returned to New Zealand in 1987 and worked at Futuna again. There he developed relationships with two 16-year-old boys who worked as volunteers at the centre.

During the year, the boys' parents approached the order's new leader, Father Grahame Connolly, and said Woodcock had abused their sons.

According to Father Duckworth, the father of one of the boys and a friend of the boy's family told Father Connolly they did not want to see Woodcock again.

"The friend of the father said, 'Do you understand what he means, Father [Connolly]? We want him out of the country'," said Father Duckworth.

"[Father Connolly] decided the best place to send [Woodcock] was a psychotherapy programme he found in Ireland and he sent him there and told him he would never again exercise ministry."

Woodcock lived with fellow Marists when he first arrived in Ireland, but he left in 1991 and found himself another job.

The next formal contact with the order was several years ago when Woodcock was removed from the priesthood.

Since Woodcock left, there have been changes in the order, including the psychological screening of candidates and the assessment of individuals for ministry work.

Father Duckworth says the order now has strict policies that would prevent the same mistakes in handling sex abuse complaints being made again.

"In this day and age, we have risk assessments, and if I was to analyse the risks [of Woodcock] with the abilities I have, we would definitely do things differently," said Father Duckworth.

* The 0800 number the Society of Mary has set up for any victims of abuse or their families to come forward will operate from 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday. The number is 0800-SMHELP (0800-764357).

Another interesting article; should have a new thread but enough is getting to be enough. I know some of you are carefully tracking all these stories, perhaps compiling them, and some have professional interest. I verified the authenticity of this story by checking the link.

Subject: A Doctor-Spokesman Attends to Papal Image Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:42:25 -0400 From: "Oliver Cromwell" Organization: War Ministry Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/29/international/europe/29NAVA.html

A Doctor-Spokesman Attends to Papal Image By JOHN TAGLIABUE

ROME - "These cardinals," said Joaquín Navarro-Valls with mock chagrin as he swept a visitor into his office just off St. Peter's Square. "They come by without any appointment. You cannot say no. So it's, `Yes, your eminence, just have a seat.' "

Nineteen years into his career as papal spokesman, Dr. Navarro-Valls, now 65, still has occasional headaches with the centuries-old papal bureaucracy, the Roman Curia.

Last year, when the Curia decided to alter the norms for reporting sexual abuse committed by priests, it neatly buried the change in a document distributed without publicity, under a cover letter in Latin.

The norms did not become generally known until a reporter for the Catholic News Service stumbled across them in a conversation with a bishop.

Why do things like this still happen?

Dr. Navarro-Valls winced.

"The Roman Curia is, historically, a very old organization," he said. "We are talking in terms of centuries. Its formal organization goes back to Sixtus V." Sixtus was a 16th-century pontiff known as the "iron pope," for creating the curial machinery essentially to crush the influence of cardinals and bishops.

The subject of sexual abuse by priests has been especially sensitive for Dr. Navarro-Valls since March, when in an interview he linked the problem to homosexuality and was quoted questioning whether the ordination of gays was valid.

As to how Pope John Paul II and the Vatican will react to the zero-tolerance approach to abusive priests adopted by the American bishops in Dallas, he stopped, suddenly tentative. "I am not a technician in canon law," he said, "but I think the main concern will be to reconcile the decisions approved in the United States with practices in other countries, to try to harmonize these decisions with the general canon law for the whole church, to try to see where there may be contradictions."

Dr. Navarro-Valls took up his work after a career as a physician and psychiatrist. Early on he saw religion, medicine and psychiatry as linked: religion would answer the questions that psychiatry could not. "I was fascinated at the time," he said of himself as a young man, "by those big questions, about life and death, and what makes man happy."

In his dealings with the press, Dr. Navarro-Valls acknowledges that he finds uses for his psychiatric training. But he struggles with the question of whether to follow the suggestion that the church should "use the media."

"I hate that formulation," he said.

He sees his work as being essentially about "giving access to the process of decision-making - not just distributing pieces of paper, but in terms of explaining why."

A medical doctor and professor of psychiatry at the universities of Barcelona and Granada in his native Spain, Dr. Navarro-Valls had published freelance articles for Spanish publications when in 1977 he was asked to cover the eastern Mediterranean for the Spanish daily ABC. He worked as a journalist until 1983, and just as he had decided to return to medicine, he received an invitation to lunch at the Vatican.

It seems that Pope John Paul, then five years into his papacy, had heard praise of him from a number of people - some belonging to the secretive Catholic men's society Opus Dei, which the doctor had joined in his early 20's. Several months later, the pope invited Dr. Navarro-Valls to overhaul the Vatican press service.

"My hobby became my profession," he said, laughing. "And medicine became my hobby."

He is not shy about his own prowess. The example that pleases him most occurred at a 1994 United Nations conference in Cairo on population and development. He was a delegate, and the Vatican succeeded, thanks in part to a curious alliance with Muslim delegations, in introducing more restrictive language on abortion in the final declaration.

Dr. Navarro-Valls waved a copy of an unclassified cable relating to that conference - a message to the State Department from President Bill Clinton's ambassador to the Holy See, Raymond L. Flynn. It described the irritation of some delegates over perceived Vatican obstructionism and manipulation, but added that the "skill and tenacity" of the Vatican's diplomats "and the public affairs virtuosity of its chief spokesman - the Spaniard Joaquín Navarro-Valls, a close confidant of the pope - took many by surprise."

While working toward a medical degree in Barcelona in the 1960's, Joaquín Navarro-Valls also got a degree in communications, a field he came to from psychiatry.

"I began from the question that arises in psychiatry of how the media in general, including advertising, influence human attitudes, both for better and for worse," he said. In 1970, his first book, "Manipulation in Advertising," appeared; three others have followed, on the media, education and the family.

He traveled widely, attending seminars at Harvard, including some on international politics by Henry A. Kissinger. Talking of those years, he described a "pilgrimage" to the London house where Freud had lived.

He is the second of five children; his father was a Cartagena lawyer. A brother is a law professor in Madrid, another is retired director of Heineken brewery's operations in Spain. He was especially close to his eldest sibling and only sister, whose death in her early 30's moved him deeply. He is still very much involved with Opus Dei, in which he now holds a senior rank that entails a commitment to celibacy.

"I took into account that the only way to find God was within the framework of my profession," he said. "I don't feel I was a Catholic physician. Instead, you are a Catholic who happens to be a physician."

Early on, the pope, whom he sees daily, assured him of access to the Vatican bureaucracy. "He opened doors," Dr. Navarro-Valls said. "Without his approach to the media, without the mentality of the pope, change would have been impossible."

He recognizes the physical handicaps of Pope John Paul, who turned 82 in May. Of his mental faculties, he said: "From the point of view of memory, or the capacity of planning for the future, those capacities are all absolutely intact. The biggest strategic decisions - now, today - are being done by the pope."

He cites the decision after Sept. 11 to convene an unusual gathering of dozens of religious leaders from Islam, Judaism and other Christian denominations to reaffirm the principle that God or religion never be invoked to justify violence. The meeting took place in January in the Italian town of Assisi.

More recently, it was the pope's decision, Dr. Navarro-Valls said, to accept the request of America's cardinals to come to Rome for two days of discussions on the priest sex abuse scandals.

Getting information from the Vatican can still be laborious (though Dr. Navarro-Valls bridles at comparisons to Kremlin secretiveness). But one example of revolutionary openness that he introduced is the pope's practice on his many travels of spending airplane time chatting with reporters in a kind of impromptu news conference. John Paul has often used such occasions to make news. On trips to Chile in 1987 and Cuba in 1998, he criticized the Pinochet and Castro dictatorships; reporters had something substantial to file on landing.

He is highly regarded by the Vatican press corps, whose members appreciate what he has achieved given the peculiarities imposed by Vatican constraints.

To this day, for example, the pope does not hold news conferences or grant interviews. In part, Dr. Navarro-Valls says, this is because so many hundreds of requests come in from news organizations around the world that saying no to everyone becomes the only effective solution.

But is it also a question of papal dignity?

"In a way, yes."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.