To: astudent
As much as I would love to lay everything at the feet of the Clintons, I can't agree with you. All these people have to be accountable and are responsible for their own actions. The Clintons, while objectively disordered, were not responsible for the defects of character exhibited by the other lawbreakers.
To: johniegrad
Undoubtedly but it will make interesting reading in about 50 years on how Rubin and the boys managed to create a bull market based on companies with no product, no cash flow and no earnings.
Unfortunately my time here will be done but I'll be looking down and smiling when that baby hits the New York Times best seller list.
3 posted on
06/29/2002 6:49:14 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: johniegrad
I agree with you. If I did not adhere to my own principles, morals, etc., how could I possibly blame the Clintons if I went wrong? I know right from wrong. Maybe the Clintons don't, but I do and I act accordingly.
8 posted on
06/29/2002 7:02:29 PM PDT by
maxwellp
To: johniegrad
Not responsible for the defects of characters? you gotta be friggin kidding me! those two DESTROYED this country with their evildoing.; Di we have these problems with our corporate leaders during Reagan or Bush I? The klintons corrupted everyone they touched. When are we gonna get to the bottom of what clinton knew about Enron, World COm GLobal Crossing etc? instead of letting this man travel around th worlkd on our dime, he shoudl be indicted NOW.
To: johniegrad
I see your point. Mine is that dishonesty by Bill and Hillary Clinton --- as the leaders of our country -- is a factor in providing a corrupt atmosphere where crooked actions become more prevalent. a nations greatness resides not in her material resourtces, but in her will, faith, intelligence and moral forces --- J M Hoppin
20 posted on
06/30/2002 3:33:54 AM PDT by
astudent
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson