Posted on 06/28/2002 3:00:46 PM PDT by Lazamataz
That's what I thought. Guess he hasn't been to Boyd's lately...
You can see the beginnings of this already in Brooklyn, where Jews planned to band together with shotguns and patrol their neighborhoods. They were immediately threatened by the City and the Chief of Police, as if they were the real threat.
Powerful government doesn't like armed usurpers taking over their monopolies of power. They will fight harder than any religious jihad. To them, it is a violation of their religion!
When the killing gets nasty, government will crack down hard against those trying to protect themselves against the threat. Decades of trashing the 2nd Amendment has assured that outcome.
Good post. A measure of gold is a measure of freedom from the government, especially in dire straits. That's why the Texas Constitution loves it and FDR stole it.
We should all make a point of finding out who, in our own neighborhoods is LE. Then, let them know that we know.
I would consider anyone trying to reduce/eliminate my ability to defend my family or property the same as a terrorist, and deal with them accordingly.
You said brass and lead will be better than gold, didn't you. Maybe in some areas.
I merely say that there may come a time (brief or never I hope) when people will trade a Krugerand even up for an old .38 revolver or 30 rounds of 5.56.
I agree.
You can't spend or trade your Maple Leaves if you can't defend them. At that time, lead brass and steel will have greater value than gold.
I'm just saying that physical fights are hard and bodily expensive to win and the first time you lose, you're done. You're right that both will be necessary.
As an experiment, time travel back to 1930s Germany and try to buy a loaf of bread for about the same amount of marks that it took a few years earlier. I don't own gold to spend at the grocery store, I own it to use when the dollar hyperinflates if it does. Try taking your real estate deed to the grocery store and see if they can use it to buy groceries. If they can't, would you say that your real estate is worthless?
As an experiment, time travel
I figured you wouldn't dare try to put your theory to the test.
Atomic bombs, plural, went off in Japan during WW2, yet the Yen remained in circulation.
As for our enemies, we are no longer under MAD but RAD, for Rest-Assured Destruction. It is no longer mutual.
Asymetrical attacks can certainly damage America, but they can NOT assure our destruction. In contrast, we already have the nuclear, chemical, biological, and conventional weaponry to assure the destruction of all non-American life on this planet.
The death cults may get what they ask for, but it will merely be their own destruction and no one else's.
Perhaps someone should have told the death cults that asymetrical attacks are lousy at defense...
As for gold, it is accepted in fewer places than is oil or Dollars. I suppose it might make some sense to have a small amount for some unforseen contingency, but clearly having guns, ammo, Dollars, oil, and various modes of transportation are all more important than holding onto an ugly yellow mass of metal that is worth a third of what it sold for 20+ years ago in non-inflation-adjusted Dollars...
I didn't buy it to spend at the grocery store. It's as simple as that. Different items have different purposes. My gold is for trading if the dollar hyperinflates. The green in my pocket is for use until it does.
The hyperinflated dollar will still be in circulation also, but that doesn't mean you'll get your money's worth for the amount of work you put in to get those dollars in the first place.
As for gold, it is accepted in fewer places than is oil or Dollars.
Barter items are also accepted in few places. But barter and gold will rule if the dollar hyperinflates due to a disaster.
I suppose it might make some sense to have a small amount for some unforseen contingency, but clearly having guns, ammo, Dollars, oil, and various modes of transportation are all more important than holding onto an ugly yellow mass of metal that is worth a third of what it sold for 20+ years ago in non-inflation-adjusted Dollars...
You're cherry-picking a time frame. Take an average of the last 6000 years and you'll see that it has always bought appoximately the same amount of loaves of bread.
It's not my fault that gold sold once for $800+ per ounce in 1980 Dollars compared to $310 per ounce in devalued modern Dollars...
Use the cash you don't spend to buy replacement gold. It shouldn't take much cash, probably none at all.
You're afraid to put your proposition to the test for even a week.
The fact that you have to cherry-pick a time frame speaks volumes.
2. The fact that you have to cherry-pick a time frame speaks volumes.
Heheheh.
John Force doesn't drive his funny car to do his daily errands the same that I don't use gold for buying milk, that doesn't mean his funny car is worthless. Force's funny car serves a purpose on special occasions (races) as my gold will on a special occasion (dollar hyperinflation). Your argument is senseless. If you really believe you have a valid point, try taking your land deed to the store to buy groceries.
Whatever you would use it for after the "crash", try using it now for a week.
If you dare.
Try using your hyperinflated dollars after the crash. There may be some old Germans that may be able to tell you what it's like.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.