"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
Whatever, considering you signed up to cast stones.
First of all, this was written three years ago. So if your point was to help Ernie's name in the public, then you did him a disservice by even bringing this back up. Second, if your point was that the press is inaccurate, and that the press is making him out to be worse than he is, you would have been more effective if you politely pointed that out rather than calling everyone ignorant, etc. Third, I would agree that a molester is worse than a voyeur. However, I still wouldn't let my kids near either.
No it doesn't. Except to be even MORE outraged at the betrayal.
WERE talking about, you idiot. No one here had said one blessed word about your precious Ernie since June 28, 2002. You only wish it was that important to us. Sheesh.
Just because someone peeps at boys does not make him a child molester. It makes him a freak but not a child molester.
It definitely makes him someone who dreams of being a child molester, since that is what turns him on. He'll get there eventually.
Your perspective changes when it is your brother, father, friend who is the voyeur
No, I don't think so. Right and wrong don't change based on my relationship with a person.
By the way, I don't believe you are Ernest or Ernest's friend. I believe you are the same pervert-defending troll who repeatedly and compulsively signs on here to defend the lowest of the low, and can't seem to stay away. You need to get a life.
Failing that, you need to get a new script.
Let me guess, you have one of those "little boy" hiarcuts that are popular with women these days.
Lady, if you don't know how thin the line is between one and the other you should stop posting.